Originally Posted by Segunda Caida
I appreciate it might be a flawed concept, but like I said I was just trying to explain why both Finlay and Funk having such great consistent careers makes me appreciate them as much as I do to the point where I'd sooner watch both over Jumbo, despite agreeing with you that his peak, matches and a couple of performances arguably blow both Finlay/Funk away.
Originally Posted by antoniomare007
I agree, but I think the best discussions come from there. To me, the importance I give to one of them depends on the wrestler we are talking about and I have a hard time understanding how people can be so definitive when it comes to "peak vs consistency" (*cough*DVDVR*cough*)
Oh yeah, I wasn't saying reading about that stuff from other posters makes my head hurt (figure of speech btw), I'm saying attmeptiing to compare it myself makes my head hurt. I always end up going
"well, wrestler A's best is a lot better than wrestler B"
"but wrestler A has had a shitty run for a half a decade before becoming good"
"but then again, his performance at ____ blows away wrestler B's best"
"but he ruined a ton of matches elsewhere and wrestler B didn't"