Thread Tools

**The Lady Killer** · 03-31-2008, 03:01 PM

The thing is, I have yet to hear anyone giving it *** (or below 5 for that matter) justify their rating.

-Destiny- · 03-31-2008, 03:04 PM

FFS, because it wasen't *****

Storytelling, emotion and the moment at the end can all be great but quite simply enough action in the ring was not done to get *****.

Christ.

**Sephiroth** · 03-31-2008, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIMBO

It's the indy section. I'm sure said individual rates every Briscoe Brothers match ****3/4.

no, but that individual does rate every 8 minute TNA spotfest around **** 1/2

i only kid

**-Mystery-** · 03-31-2008, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Lady Killer

Embarrassing.

I have still yet to hear a legitimate claim about something going wrong in the match.

Uhh...Flair failing to work over the injured ribs of Michaels sticks out big time. It's such a simple psychology, exploiting an injury.

Also, lol @ people are already saying Flair/Michaels is MOTY. I'm really starting to think that people might actually be brainwashed by the allure of Flair. Flair probably could've wrestled a broom and people would call it MOTY.

**Spartanlax** · 03-31-2008, 03:13 PM

My fucking gym teachers spoiled WrestleMania as soon as I saw them today...I can't be spoiler-free even if I avoid this and all wrestling sites like the plauge.

That said, I got to come here and look at ratings...WM24 looks pretty solid. I can't WAIT to see the Flair/Michaels match...never been more excited for a match.

**Sephiroth** · 03-31-2008, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Mystery-

Flair probably could've wrestled a broom and people would call it MOTY.

i could buy that. depends tho if Flair gets a splinter which turns into a crimson mask

**SuperBrawl** · 03-31-2008, 03:18 PM

By Flair busting out moves he hasn't used in years like the underhook suplex and the stalling vertical suplex, he was exploiting Michaels' ribs. He caught an opening with the ribs grounding Michaels so that he could go after his legs once Michaels was hurt. Why wouldn't he abandon the ribs to go after the legs? He wasn't goign to win the match by working on Michaels' ribs. He knew he had to go for the figure fou to win the match, so he worked on the legs. It's a travesty to say he abandoned working on the ribs.

**WCW** · 03-31-2008, 03:21 PM

lmao both of you are over analyzing it now. I'd rather just marvel at the spectacle I just witnessed.

**SuperBrawl** · 03-31-2008, 03:23 PM

Fair enough.

**-Mystery-** · 03-31-2008, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperBrawl

By Flair busting out moves he hasn't used in years like the underhook suplex and the stalling vertical suplex, he was exploiting Michaels' ribs. He caught an opening with the ribs grounding Michaels so that he could go after his legs once Michaels was hurt. Why wouldn't he abandon the ribs to go after the legs? He wasn't goign to win the match by working on Michaels' ribs. He knew he had to go for the figure fou to win the match, so he worked on the legs. It's a travesty to say he abandoned working on the ribs.

Two moves doesn't constitute working over the ribs, sorry. I can't believe you asked why Flair should work over the ribs. The ribs protect the lungs, you use lungs to breathe. By Flair working over the ribs, he was taking away Michaels' energy and weakening him down. Then, you start working over the legs and by the time you'd be ready to lock in the figure four, Michaels would be out of breath and his legs would be in tremendous pain and he'd have no choice by to tap. It's that simple.