Originally Posted by 3VK
All opinions are biased. That's why they're personal opinions. Im not even going to say whether I agree with you are not but you really need to go about your arguments better. All your doing is attacking people's opinions rather than supporting your own and when someone does that no one is going to take them very seriously. There is no other fallacy in reasoning as laughable as that.
No you're wrong. I supported my opinion. I said why the match fell flat and why it was uninteresting. All he did was say "Regal/Ohno was fantastic".
I'm willing to discuss the match and my opinion of it but it seems people here have a boner for Ohno, for whatever reason, and don't like when people criticize his recent work.
I understand that appreciating wretling is subjective but like x78 said, if that same exact match was Scott Dawson/Conor O'Brian people here would be talking about how boring it was and how green whoever replaced Ohno was, and how innefective someone was as a babyface. Nevermind the overall quality of the feud and the promos, very lackluster.