Originally Posted by Cynic
A year ago, everyone on here was all apeshit over how great CM Punk was and that he needed to get pushed. Then he did get pushed, and now the same people who wanted him to get pushed hate him for being stale and boring, because who can like a guy who actually does get pushed? So how long before Ambrose hate becomes fashionable from the same people praising him? 6 months? A year? I look forward to finding out.
Ambrose is a other case. He has more potential and is better than Punk was. He has "IT". Punk is talented, but he dosent have "IT". Ambrose is also good on the mic and is a thecnical wrestler.
And Punk even called Ambrose "Our secret weapon".
Ambrose and Punk are to different wrestlers, who got noticed in to different stages in their careers. It's wrong to compare those two to each other.
Tyrion Lannister : Ambrose have the potential to be a top guy and be over Cena level and maybe being on Rock/Austin level. The problem is that WWE is not to good to push people these days and they are too childfriendly.
I feel that Ambrose is the young superstar that has the best potential. But at the same time i feel that he is in the wrong era, he should have been here maybe in the attitude era or ruthless agression era.