[Rising]

Originally Posted by Faraday

But on who????

Well the case against you although not substantial seems best there is ....

Originally Posted by Skyfall

I gave reasons for my vote, on day 1, like you said we should, Faraday. But since that makes me an idiot, I should stop giving reasons. But you said we should give reasons. But if those reasons are against you, then they're dumb, and I should give them. But then I can never vote for you...

I'm confused. But you made me think you are definitely scum and not just a possibility.

Well don't take it personally that's their opinion and sometimes people just expect people think like them so it won't happen so ya express hear view specially the one who your accusing will always state your opinion is wrong which ever alignment they are its others you have to convince

Originally Posted by Anark

Red tie, red band on hat.

SCUM.

Look so but then would he come in open wearing it?

[Faraday]

Originally Posted by CHAMPviaDQ

I am aware of that and that doesn't make one bit of difference to me.

Well okay, it should. Also trusting no one in a mafia game is probably not a good idea - not having any town reads or anything like that is kind of a sub optimal way to play.

[Faraday]

Originally Posted by Rising

Well the case against you although not substantial seems best there is ....

Can you sum up the case against me? What do you think of Skyfall's points about my supposed contradiction between calling 2 seperate incidencts 2 seperate things? Or maybe the fact I walked my dog for 3/4 of an hour and disappeared is the straw that breaks the camels back!

Also that doesn't really inspire confidence rising, but I was being sarcastic in my response anyway so it doesn't even really matter.

[Gambit]

This faraday and skyfall fight looks interesting but they both seem town. Whoever is the duelist should make them duel

[Cloverleaf]

Originally Posted by Faraday

Well okay, it should. Also trusting no one in a mafia game is probably not a good idea - not having any town reads or anything like that is kind of a sub optimal way to play.

Great point from Faraday here, I made the mistake of not trusting anyone and it got me NOWHERE.

This, as well as following your gut is the key, imo.

[Skyfall]

why did you vote McLovin It and not ZigglerMark Faraday?

[IMPULSE]

not liking this game talk on day one. more spam please.

[The_Answer]

Originally Posted by Faraday

Well you did bring up what you'd do as scum? <_< But okay, I just was wondering which you meant.


P.s. read on scrilla (who admittedly has only 1 post I think) and anark PHEN0M?

Ah ok, sorry I didn't make that clear. Scrilla has 5 posts, all nonsense, jumped up for McLovin rather quickly when you mentioned McLovin and scum in the same sentence. Nothing too damning for evidence but nothing that screams town either.

Anark- Like was stated, he has only really been arguing with you, I feel some of the points as to why you were asking why people voted were forced, you've stated multiple times why you did it. Other than that he hasn't given me any off vibes, merely see him as picking your brain about things.

[Faraday]

B/c I found McLovin's first posts vaguely scummy whereas there's nothing inherently scummy 'bout Ziggler's first post by itself - it's just weird.

[Gambit]

Originally Posted by IMPULSE

not liking this game talk on day one. more spam please.