I gave reasons for my vote, on day 1, like you said we should, Faraday. But since that makes me an idiot, I should stop giving reasons. But you said we should give reasons. But if those reasons are against you, then they're dumb, and I should give them. But then I can never vote for you...
I'm confused. But you made me think you are definitely scum and not just a possibility.
Well don't take it personally that's their opinion and sometimes people just expect people think like them so it won't happen so ya express hear view specially the one who your accusing will always state your opinion is wrong which ever alignment they are its others you have to convince
Well the case against you although not substantial seems best there is ....
Can you sum up the case against me? What do you think of Skyfall's points about my supposed contradiction between calling 2 seperate incidencts 2 seperate things? Or maybe the fact I walked my dog for 3/4 of an hour and disappeared is the straw that breaks the camels back!
Also that doesn't really inspire confidence rising, but I was being sarcastic in my response anyway so it doesn't even really matter.
Well you did bring up what you'd do as scum? <_< But okay, I just was wondering which you meant.
P.s. read on scrilla (who admittedly has only 1 post I think) and anark PHEN0M?
Ah ok, sorry I didn't make that clear. Scrilla has 5 posts, all nonsense, jumped up for McLovin rather quickly when you mentioned McLovin and scum in the same sentence. Nothing too damning for evidence but nothing that screams town either.
Anark- Like was stated, he has only really been arguing with you, I feel some of the points as to why you were asking why people voted were forced, you've stated multiple times why you did it. Other than that he hasn't given me any off vibes, merely see him as picking your brain about things.