I think Imp has made a strong case for his reasoning, though magic appears to have a strong read on metas and overall play, left me less convinced on imp but still suspect just because of how convinced magic is as well as his reasoning based on past play which no-one has pulled up as wrong.
Feel my read on imp wasn't helped by being lost with his style of play and intent, especially the part about docblue.
dan made a multi quote post of Lawls as the basis for thinking he was scum here:
That combined with a very suspect and inconvienient claim on his behalf coupled by the strong reasoning and doubting its authenticity with Balotelli as the player (he made a comment about what he'd do if he was racially abused at the euros this past summer, but that's about it as far as his involvement with racism goes) has me supporting the wagon on him. His play hasn't been convincing and very little in terms of notable analysis and reasoning is coming from his posts.
unvote vote Lawls