I was going to multiquote your death sentence, but I think I mized you up with LC...
as for getting lucky with the lynch, not at all. I stated reasons why I felt Roger was scummy; I then pushed on it when a few people agreed. that led other people to read Roger and get their opinion.
Plus, that "no reason" I posted got us to the point where he refused to claim, which then made it pretty apparent he was scum. It was a good day. If we used your logic, no one would ever say anything about scum unless they had info. I'm not trying to boast here, it was seriously a good day that started with a slight read from me.
The fact people are saying they didn't agree with the reasoning is good; it's getting them to actually think about people's alignments and not just sheeping. The length that wagon took to build, then rebuild, was a great sign Roger was scum. It's obvious hindsight now, but it's more obvious that he was scum the whole time.
and just so you know I'm saying this calmly and not angrily.
Huh? Are you quoting me but referring to someone else? What do you mean about my logic?
i already said there are only two players who are allowed to read me. follow the rules!
i voted roger early, i questioned why he asked me if i was going to kill him, i stayed on the wagon until the claim and then got off until it was disputed by players with theme knowledge. i then hammered.
not sure how you get scum out of that, but you need to readjust your scumhunting. it's offtrack.
My town read on you is wrong? Good to know... I take it you're referring to my post a while back where you asked if there was a sensor. How about you catch up already. That's old news dollface