I was going to multiquote your death sentence, but I think I mized you up with LC...
as for getting lucky with the lynch, not at all. I stated reasons why I felt Roger was scummy; I then pushed on it when a few people agreed. that led other people to read Roger and get their opinion.
Plus, that "no reason" I posted got us to the point where he refused to claim, which then made it pretty apparent he was scum. It was a good day. If we used your logic, no one would ever say anything about scum unless they had info. I'm not trying to boast here, it was seriously a good day that started with a slight read from me.
The fact people are saying they didn't agree with the reasoning is good; it's getting them to actually think about people's alignments and not just sheeping. The length that wagon took to build, then rebuild, was a great sign Roger was scum. It's obvious hindsight now, but it's more obvious that he was scum the whole time.
and :jesse just so you know I'm saying this calmly and not angrily.
Huh? Are you quoting me but referring to someone else? What do you mean about my logic?
i already said there are only two players who are allowed to read me. follow the rules!
i voted roger early, i questioned why he asked me if i was going to kill him, i stayed on the wagon until the claim and then got off until it was disputed by players with theme knowledge. i then hammered.
not sure how you get scum out of that, but you need to readjust your scumhunting. it's offtrack.
My town read on you is wrong? Good to know... I take it you're referring to my post a while back where you asked if there was a sensor. How about you catch up already. That's old news dollface