Anark has played weird. Let's start off with his cop handling.
1. He disputed the legitimacy off the cop and his results in particular. Called them fishy. This relates to a theory I have about Sterling.
2. He tried to establish himself as town regardless of the results. That could suggest that Josh's results at one point were to be called into question. Seeing what happened with Doc, Rising and Sterling's result you see the theme.
3. He tried to assure us that he was town regardless of konig's result. That could indicate that scum have a role that would make us call previous results into questions and he didn't want the taint.
4. Tried his hardest to get the credit for the Croft lynch and try to downplay the significance the guilty had in it's success. That screams bussing.
I would agree. He came in with results confirming me and Nov as town, shortly after Nov was killed and confirmed as town anyway. Everyone seems pretty certain of my townness already as well, so that's either the most useless cop info ever posted or there's something fishy about it.
Tries to connect the cop to the BG's death. Anyone remember our fiascoes with Voyeur results right about now?
He's pushing being town regardless and damaging the cop's credibility.
Yeah, after Nov was already dead and revealed to everyone. Then his other one is me, someone who, regardless of whether I am or not, has largely been considered to be town for quite a long time already. He also neglects to mention his other one.
Nice one, j.konig.
There's so much for others though. LC's exposure of Taylor is fine, but she might be playing us. If so, then she is also playing us with Lawls. If we go off of LC's info, then it should blatantly be Lawls before Taylor. Maybe not blatantly, but accordingly to me.
J.konig, you need to get in here during this night and explain yourself or day is going to be a very simple affair.
You driving the point of the death and the cop visiting Nov makes me suspect that the Cop somehow visited Nov the night of his death. You keep going on about it, when it isn't out the realm of possibility that someone you use your role on can die.
You try real hard to damage his credibility.
You suggest we go after a bus driver who can alter scum kills ahead of a serial killer who scum can block. That comes off as convenient.
You seem like your trying to catch the cop in something and threatened to lynch him.
Can anyone explain any of this to me? Thoughts? Because I have more.
We have an investigative role who credibility is shot and we have a player who went out of his way to shoot down the cop's credibility.
It doesn't make sense for him as town because Anark isn't dumb.