Thread Tools

**LadyCroft** · 11-09-2012, 12:51 PM

Goddamnit, I was about to change my vote to Lawls until Fitz just said to vote for Lawls. Now I don't trust it.

I don't like how Lawls is stalling though. I don't like that at all. And it's not like he wasn't on. He even posted that he's not stalling so what exactly is he doing? Damn you Fitz for making me doubt this.

**Shepard** · 11-09-2012, 01:22 PM

Midnight GMT sounds like a fair deadline? I'm willing to let day 1 go up to like 48 hours, which would be about 12 hours from now, I suppose I'll see how it is before I go to sleep.

**WHINY CUNT** · 11-09-2012, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shepard

Midnight GMT sounds like a fair deadline? I'm willing to let day 1 go up to like 48 hours, which would be about 12 hours from now, I suppose I'll see how it is before I go to sleep.

as long as its active...otherwise it becomes stagnant

Anark · 11-09-2012, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hit-Girl

Goddamnit, I was about to change my vote to Lawls until Fitz just said to vote for Lawls. Now I don't trust it.

I don't like how Lawls is stalling though. I don't like that at all. And it's not like he wasn't on. He even posted that he's not stalling so what exactly is he doing? Damn you Fitz for making me doubt this.

What Taylor said makes sense. I'm not going to pretend I can read him, but every time I play there is always one or two people going for him off the bat, yet he's hardly ever been scum in games I've played. He's also a very good town player, so knocking him off early is not a good plan unless people are absolutely sure, which they are not.

Let's get this Lawls thing done and reassess our reads from there.

Patrick Bateman · 11-09-2012, 01:56 PM

shucky ducky quack quack.

**TaylorFitz** · 11-09-2012, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stone Cold 4life

Tbf I'm pretty sure Lawls will be asleep atm. He is in Oz after all. Not defending, just a bit of common sense entering the thread.

He was awake with 7 votes on him and said it wasn't enough for a claim. What did he think would happen when he said this? Yeah he might be asleep now but he said was willing to claim and then went to bed thinking the deadline would pass and we wouldn't lynch him without claiming. He's being a SCARED COWARD by making sure the time he needs to be in the thread is the time he isn't online. He set himself up for a claim and then went to bed.

**DocBlue** · 11-09-2012, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyfall

There is no reason to vote Lawls. because he ignored a fake claim and fake info and fake PR? I'm doing that, vote me. doc is doing that, vote him. Faraday did it too, vote him. lets vote everyone! If Lawls is scum then I'm a fruit selling merchant!

I don't think those are the reasons for voting Lawls though? Certainly not mine. What's with all the fruit talk?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TaylorFitz

unvote Vote Lawls

He's stalling.

I dunno, what he said seems to indicate that he can confirm himself so i'd rather not lynch without a claim. That shit didn't go down so well with Dan in Fallout Mafia.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TaylorFitz

It doesn't really matter that Paco appears to be claiming hated townie. It's not like anyone other than a vig was going to kill him anyway.

It narrows down those with a power role though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hit-Girl

Goddamnit, I was about to change my vote to Lawls until Fitz just said to vote for Lawls. Now I don't trust it.

I don't like how Lawls is stalling though. I don't like that at all. And it's not like he wasn't on. He even posted that he's not stalling so what exactly is he doing? Damn you Fitz for making me doubt this.

What is this? That's some pretty bad reasoning for not voting someone. If Lawls flips scum then we should definitely look into LC.

**Cloverleaf** · 11-09-2012, 02:05 PM

Sounds like a fair bit of time to potentially get something else going?

This Lawls wagon has stalled dramatically (like Lawls is).

He might not even be back on before that deadline passes.

**DocBlue** · 11-09-2012, 02:10 PM

Revolver has 14 posts of pure, unadulterated fluff. Care to offer us any reads?

**TaylorFitz** · 11-09-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DocBlue

I don't think those are the reasons for voting Lawls though? Certainly not mine. What's with all the fruit talk?

I dunno, what he said seems to indicate that he can confirm himself so i'd rather not lynch without a claim. That shit didn't go down so well with Dan in Fallout Mafia.

It narrows down those with a power role though.

What is this? That's some pretty bad reasoning for not voting someone. If Lawls flips scum then we should definitely look into LC.

Scum wouldn't target Paco with any type of role anyway.

I doubt Lawls can confirm himself and if he could he should have done so before he went to bed when he was halfway to majority.