Thread Tools

**Quasi Juice** · 09-29-2012, 09:47 AM

Who's Wallaben on the player list, Sterling? Also, Striker is in this game, lolwut? If he's not being replaced it could be because he's scum and active behind the scenes. We have a good amount of confirmed townies now too.

Vote: Striker

**DocBlue** · 09-29-2012, 10:06 AM

I think Wallaben is Sterling. If so he has 0 posts.
9 to hammer btw. 5 on Anark. Tbh I just find his posts have seemed awkward and in particular his post when he voted Sheamus was weird, especially considering Sheamus was confirmed scum via info. I think he's probably not aligned with IMP but quite possibly is aligned with Sheamus. He really hasn't done much else but I think he usually puts more effort into scum hunting than he has been doing. I say go for it and see what happens. Dunno how long is left in Day.

**Bullseye** · 09-29-2012, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quasi Juice

Who's Wallaben on the player list, Sterling? Also, Striker is in this game, lolwut? If he's not being replaced it could be because he's scum and active behind the scenes. We have a good amount of confirmed townies now too.

Vote: Striker

I am WallaBen. Shockingly dreadful former username

Striker was replaced by LC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DocBlue

I think Wallaben is Sterling. If so he has 0 posts.
9 to hammer btw. 5 on Anark. Tbh I just find his posts have seemed awkward and in particular his post when he voted Sheamus was weird, especially considering Sheamus was confirmed scum via info. I think he's probably not aligned with IMP but quite possibly is aligned with Sheamus. He really hasn't done much else but I think he usually puts more effort into scum hunting than he has been doing. I say go for it and see what happens. Dunno how long is left in Day.

at this stage of the game pushing for a 'just go for it and see what happens' isn't exactly what we need.

**DocBlue** · 09-29-2012, 10:34 AM

Sorry I didn't realise your 'inactivity' reasoning was so solid. Have you played with Big before? I suggest that you come up with a better suggestion, or provide better reasoning on your wagon. Your no sell of the Anark wagon in your multi-quote was pretty odd. If Anark is scum you're gonna look pretty suss.

**Skyfall** · 09-29-2012, 10:37 AM

I'll help vote Anark if someone gets good evidence. I took some suspicious quotes, but didn't see anything too weird. He is usually active at scum hunting, but he did say he would be not-so-active in the beginning.

this is just a theory, but, perhaps the people who have not been replaced are town, and the early replaced people are scum. TKOK! just wanted to get rid of inactive scum right away. but since I can't prove that in any way right now, forget about it!

I'll be blunt, I want a claim from Mikey. His asking of my role usage makes me think I was watched/tracked/role copped by him or something. until then, I'm keeping my vote on him.

**Bullseye** · 09-29-2012, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DocBlue

Sorry I didn't realise your 'inactivity' reasoning was so solid. Have you played with Big before? I suggest that you come up with a better suggestion, or provide better reasoning on your wagon. Your no sell of the Anark wagon in your multi-quote was pretty odd. If Anark is scum you're gonna look pretty suss.

Yes, and almost every time that he's been scum, he's laid low and been seldomly active.

If someone can provide a legit reason for pursuing Anark, then I'll throw a vote his way. With the game being at this stage, Day 4, it's not wise to continue voting to 'see what happens.'

Better reasoning? I have no better reasoning, other than a tunneled hunch and his pattern of inactive scumness.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyfall

I'll help vote Anark if someone gets good evidence. I took some suspicious quotes, but didn't see anything too weird. He is usually active at scum hunting, but he did say he would be not-so-active in the beginning.

this is just a theory, but, perhaps the people who have not been replaced are town, and the early replaced people are scum. TKOK! just wanted to get rid of inactive scum right away. but since I can't prove that in any way right now, forget about it!

I'll be blunt, I want a claim from Mikey. His asking of my role usage makes me think I was watched/tracked/role copped by him or something. until then, I'm keeping my vote on him.

@ the Mikey part.

**Mikey Damage** · 09-29-2012, 10:45 AM

Don't guess/play with the mod. You have no idea how he's handling the inactives.

I don't need to claim until there is a wagon on me.

Also. Why is this Anark wagon stalling? And where is his claim with five votes on him...?

Big_Man · 09-29-2012, 10:54 AM

I'm being as active as I can. TKOK already knew I'd be inactive and I only signed up because he needed one more person. Inactivity has nothing to do with my alignment, its not like I can't play as scum and am afraid to post - I post whenever I'm online.

I'll wait for Anark to claim.

**Bullseye** · 09-29-2012, 11:00 AM

And look who pops up when it's being questioned. Yes, you were in because TKOK! needed someone, but there have been 4 others replaced and you weren't even considered for said replacement.

Anark you'd better come on and claim. You know what, screw it, I'm off to bed and things will go down when I'm asleep

Unvote

Vote: Anark

Hopefully if/when you claim, the right call is made.

**TaylorFitz** · 09-29-2012, 11:05 AM

vote sXe

That's what I'm getting out of all of this. I'll switch to Anark later if I have to though. I honestly don't really remember anything Anark has posted this game. Wouldn't surprise me if one of Anark/sXe flips scum the other would be the same alignment though after sXe defended him when it was unlikely he would get lynched without a claim.

Now he's throwing in the towel and hoping on the wagon because it looks close to a lynch.