All i'm saying Words is that Emarosa has said nothing since accusing me and has given no reason for accusing me, so yeh, i do think you should take my claim over Emarosa's non-existant role related info.
Actually, why don't we push this through? If SL flips town then Emarosa is probably scum/got wrong info somehow and UDK is probable town. If SL flips scum (and is still masons with UDK) UDK is still probably town, if SL flips straight scum UDK is also probably scum. I think we can accomplish similar results by lynching Emarosa, but I'd rather go after him next if he's lying in case he isn't, so we don't obliterate a cop (even an insane one) on Day 2.
Did that make sense to anybody else?
It makes sense, just the logic is a bit meh (imo). I just have a hard time lynching a mason, even though it's still a dodgy claim, despite being 'confirmed' by your mason partner. I really don't see your last option (both being scum) happening because if scum claim to be mason partners and one of them comes up as scum but without a partner, the other one would be lynched immediately, so take that option away because it's highly unlikely (or SL/UDK are stupid, but I don't think so).
I'm still not sure why people are voting SL. I'd rather wait for Emarosa to show up and clai-owait, he can't claim. Ridiculous. Oh well, he's getting killed by the mafia tonight anyway so imo he should just claim for lolfactor.
I would generally agree it's a terrible idea, but in a game where you can't claim w/o 50% of the vote on you it makes it easier to fakeclaim. If somebody wanted to CC they'd have to force people to vote for them, CC, then hope people believe them. IDK.