Pixar Mafia - Page 59 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #581 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 08:54 PM
STOCKING STUFFER
 
STUFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 3,487
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postage View Post
doesn't apply to individuals. ;D
...says the individual.


STUFF is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #582 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:00 PM
Amazing
 
Postage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

says the first post actually.

did you graduate from QCC or something Certs.

Postage is offline  
post #583 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:03 PM
DH
lyfe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 8,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postage View Post
Calling a Lostfan/Kantos mafia partnership, just because.

According to the write-up it looks like only Pixar characters can be innocents. Thus the mafia as well as indies are irrelevant to the theme. So I can believe Chuck Norris claim although pretty out there.

I'll hold off on lynching for the moment, see if anyone is gonna counterclaim Wesson as Mike Wazowski.
I don't get why you're stalling to lynch. You claim it's because you're waiting for a counterclaim, which is total garbage due to countless possibilities of characters that could be claimed/fake-claimed.

If you had noted that RKO claimed Wesson's old role, but didn't claim it exactly, that would be more reasonable, but instead, you made up some crap about waiting for a counterclaim. This just doesn't add up to me at all, so an explanation would be good (irdc if you feel this is irrelevant, but your reasoning for stalling to lynch someone who came up as guilty to an investigation baffles me).
DH is offline  
post #584 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:04 PM
STOCKING STUFFER
 
STUFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 3,487
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

It says nothing conclusive in the first post. QCC can lick my balls

DH, he lynched already. Majority has been reached.


STUFF is offline  
post #585 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:10 PM
...
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: England.
Posts: 3,045
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

No it hasn't.

Tenacious.C is offline  
post #586 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:13 PM
DH
lyfe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 8,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

I realize that, but re-read my post. I'm curious as to why he would wait for a counterclaim on someone who came up guilty in a game where there are many possible characters.

Edit: Majority hasn't been reached, he edited his post and added Postage & Tenacious C's votes.
DH is offline  
post #587 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:20 PM
STOCKING STUFFER
 
STUFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 3,487
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

Ohhhhhh icwuthedidthere. My bad.

Someone hammer then. Way too many inactives


STUFF is offline  
post #588 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:24 PM
Amazing
 
Postage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

Quote:
Originally Posted by DH. View Post
I don't get why you're stalling to lynch. You claim it's because you're waiting for a counterclaim, which is total garbage due to countless possibilities of characters that could be claimed/fake-claimed.

If you had noted that RKO claimed Wesson's old role, but didn't claim it exactly, that would be more reasonable, but instead, you made up some crap about waiting for a counterclaim. This just doesn't add up to me at all, so an explanation would be good (irdc if you feel this is irrelevant, but your reasoning for stalling to lynch someone who came up as guilty to an investigation baffles me).
I've inclined to believe that individuals DO NOT have safe claims but that's just what I think. Others have disagreed.

So Wesson's cc wasn't his safe claim but something he just made up. So why not have someone counter so we can make sure this lynch was good.

That and the fact that RKO920 knowing Wessons character and alignment is a little weird. Just Sayin'

anyway, if indies do have safe claims it'll say in Wessons role when it's posted hopefully. so then that question will be cleared. If he's indy that is.

Postage is offline  
post #589 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:29 PM
STOCKING STUFFER
 
STUFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Queens, NYC
Posts: 3,487
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

I'm inclined to believe anyone non-Pixar was given safe claims. Not sure if indy's are non-pixar or villains from the movies.


STUFF is offline  
post #590 of 969 (permalink) Old 07-29-2009, 09:43 PM
Amazing
 
Postage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Pixar Mafia

Well RKO said Wesson was Chuck Norris, so...

Postage is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome