Thread Tools

**Emarosa** · 04-12-2008, 06:19 AM

Unlynch BrownieDude

Lynch NaS

Seems to point in the ring direction

sneapy · 04-12-2008, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaS

I am still lynching the same person so really I'm not changing my opinion a whole lot just don;t think brownie should be first to go. He is most likly mafia and should be lynched but I don't think just yet.

I don't know if it's just me, but i don't see the sense in that. If you think someone is most likely mafia, then why make a random lynch instead

.

**Craig** · 04-12-2008, 06:26 AM

I hate changing my vote, because it makes me look suspicous (People who played Brownie's mafia game will know waht I'm talking about) but

Un-lynch: Browniedude
Lynch: NaS

**Dovahkiin** · 04-12-2008, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sneapy

I don't know if it's just me, but i don't see the sense in that. If you think someone is most likely mafia, then why make a random lynch instead

.

Me too but it might be good if we take down a mafia member right away but it might be better to lynch no one. so far the only one that I can see as mafia is Browniedude. But any way since there's no clues we might as well lynch some one who will not play instead of some one that is very active and might have a role. but that's just my opinion so tell me what you think she we lynch or not?

besides last game killswitch who was mafia got all the innocent's too trust him and lynch the hero's I don't want them to jump on the bandwagon and lycnh me and find out they made a mistake.

**Faraday** · 04-12-2008, 06:32 AM

We need to lynch definitely,we may not be in a better position tomorrow tbh.No lynching doesn;t help.

I'm tempted to lynch someone who hasn;t posted yet,it's be very mafia like to let us accuse each other while they hand bang laughing.

NaS does come across as suspicious alright I agree. Not sure yet though.

**Fail** · 04-12-2008, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaS

Me too but it might be good if we take down a mafia member right away but it might be better to lynch no one. so far the only one that I can see as mafia is Browniedude. But any way since there's no clues we might as well lynch some one who will not play instead of some one that is very active and might have a role. but that's just my opinion so tell me what you think she we lynch or not?

besides last game killswitch who was mafia got all the innocent's too trust him and lynch the hero's I don't want them to jump on the bandwagon and lycnh me and find out they made a mistake.

Besides me, I knew he was mafia.

Either way, I say we lynch someone. This could either make us, or break us. We can't let an opportunity like this go away because it could stab us in the back later.

**ThunderAngel** · 04-12-2008, 06:41 AM

This thread is confusing. GA how about having a "gameplay" thread like me and MetalX did?

No lynching would give mafia 1st blood but what are the chances of us taking out a mafia? I think townie to maifa is just over 2-1. So we have an under 33% of lynching a mafia. I would think its best no lynch and loose one 1 innocent rather than playing the 66-33 game of loosing two innocents. If the odds were different I would, but they are not in our favour.

**.Skittles.** · 04-12-2008, 06:58 AM

T-man makes a good arguement, theres a bigger risk of loosing 2 innocents if we Lynch. Im all up for the blood-thirsty angle but without any clues id rather be a kill behind than 2 peeps behind.

sneapy · 04-12-2008, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaS

Me too but it might be good if we take down a mafia member right away but it might be better to lynch no one. so far the only one that I can see as mafia is Browniedude. But any way since there's no clues we might as well lynch some one who will not play instead of some one that is very active and might have a role. but that's just my opinion so tell me what you think she we lynch or not?

besides last game killswitch who was mafia got all the innocent's too trust him and lynch the hero's I don't want them to jump on the bandwagon and lycnh me and find out they made a mistake.

The roles were given out randomly, so just because someone is active, doesn't mean they have more chance of getting a good power.

And again you seem to be contradicting yourself. In that post you say that it might be better to lynch no one, then a few sentances later claim that it might be better to lynch someone who you don't think will play.

Although after saying that, right now i'm prefering the idea of not lyncing tonight, since the odds aren't in our favour. Even though someone who isn't active, isn't very useful, if they're innocent then we can still use them to keep the ratio of innocents to mafia in our favour. Look what happened in the last game, the innocents started lynching random inactive players and it lead to their downfall.

**Dovahkiin** · 04-12-2008, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sneapy

The roles were given out randomly, so just because someone is active, doesn't mean they have more chance of getting a good power.

And again you seem to be contradicting yourself. In that post you say that it might be better to lynch no one, then a few sentances later claim that it might be better to lynch someone who you don't think will play.

Although after saying that, right now i'm prefering the idea of not lyncing tonight, since the odds aren't in our favour. Even though someone who isn't active, isn't very useful, if they're innocent then we can still use them to keep the ratio of innocents to mafia in our favour. Look what happened in the last game, the innocents started lynching random inactive players and it lead to their downfall.

That's what I'm trying to avoid now and you don't seem to understand that.

No I meant that we should not lynch now. but we should think about lynching browniedude down the road on another time. But for now we should hold on until we get clues and are more sure of who's mafia.