PG Rating isn't the problem - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 06-21-2013, 12:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Adam Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,091
Adam Cool is an after thoughtAdam Cool is an after thoughtAdam Cool is an after thought
Default PG Rating isn't the problem

I hear alot of people saying that the reason WWE sucks now is because of the PG rating. but its not, the problem is the storylines,Wrong people being jobbers and wrong people being top carders, the predictability etc. But from what we seen from this weeks raw things are starting to improve so just be Quite and hope they keep it up like this weeks raw.
__________________

If you disagree with Tyrion Lannister, Kill yourself, You are a disgrace to the human race.
Adam Cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 06-21-2013, 12:14 AM   #2 (permalink)
The Face Of The Company
 
dxbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,391
dxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a pushdxbender is getting a push
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

PG rating is far from the problem. People need to realize that some of most watched shows on TV are PG. But on this site, people act like PG means some Disney cartoon stuff.
__________________
dxbender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 12:19 AM   #3 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
SnoopSystem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Monday Night RAW
Posts: 1,584
SnoopSystem should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsSnoopSystem should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsSnoopSystem should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsSnoopSystem should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsSnoopSystem should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

There is a deeper problem...the main source is McMahon, writing team, and whoever else is in charge.

They have this extreme PG mindset in which they want to make the product very very PG. We can still have a great PG product in the PG era if they would keep creating quality storylines, characters, and proper booking. It doesn't need to return to the Attitude Era. Just ask the Ruthless Agression era. Just look at the product right before it became PG.

Cena, Batista, and Orton were new talent and got pushed to the top. And next thing we know, they are veterans. There were also other new great stars like Bobby Lashley and CM Punk. WWE just has to sustain the quality that they had in that era but subtract some of the bad stuff for the little kids.

Here are some examples of great PG era feuds: Remember in 2009 when Triple H invaded Randy Orton's house and they brawled? That was intense. Remember in 2010 when Jack Swagger dragged Rey Mysterio's broken leg backstage into the arena? Intense. This just goes to show that WWE doesn't need to make things too PG.

The other problem...is the ove...e of Cena. It's time to give him the Jericho treatment and place him in smaller storylines. Put other new guys at the top like they did with Cena, Batista, and Orton back in the day. Just make sure the new guys aren't jokes. They have to be the real deal.
__________________

Last edited by SnoopSystem : 06-21-2013 at 12:22 AM.
SnoopSystem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 03:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,354
TEWA needs to take rep more seriousTEWA needs to take rep more seriousTEWA needs to take rep more seriousTEWA needs to take rep more seriousTEWA needs to take rep more seriousTEWA needs to take rep more seriousTEWA needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

Bewbs and swears are the answer clearly. Not quality storytelling and interesting characters.
TEWA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 03:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Meltzer said I'm a good worker
 
Punkholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 8,990
Punkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missedPunkholic probably won't be missed
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

Creative is the problem.
__________________
Punkholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 03:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Spiros Vondas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Greater Los Angeles Area
Posts: 3,475
Spiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missedSpiros Vondas probably won't be missed
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by TEWA View Post
Bewbs and swears are the answer clearly. Not quality storytelling and interesting characters.
Why not quality storytelling with interesting characters who have bewbs and swear?
__________________
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic234578_32.gif
Spiros Vondas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 03:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Palahniuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,497
Palahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new herePalahniuk better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

There's a difference between child-friendly and childish.

To go all nerdy on you, Star Wars Episodes 5 and 6 were both PG

One was compelling and quite dark at times, the other was full of annoying, fluffy bears defeating armies.

WWE could appeal to all demographics under the current rating but they're happy to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
Palahniuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 04:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 916
BlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

Predictability, poor writing and over-reliance and over-exposure of John Cena have been problems for me. Their is no reason why WWE can't produce a good product within a PG rating. It's all down to the booking and writing. The 80's/early 90's were awesome and they were PG.
BlandyBoreton83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 04:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moron
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,070
Apex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new hereApex Rattlesnake better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlandyBoreton83 View Post
Predictability, poor writing and over-reliance and over-exposure of John Cena have been problems for me. Their is no reason why WWE can't produce a good product within a PG rating. It's all down to the booking and writing. The 80's/early 90's were awesome and they were PG.
100% agree with you. Repped
Apex Rattlesnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 04:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 916
BlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsBlandyBoreton83 should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: PG Rating isn't the problem

Thanks mate
BlandyBoreton83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios