Whatever, I liked Lance Storm.
I also loved Dean Malenko, he was one of my favorite WCW guys. And before anyone starts calling me a "workrate mark", I've been a fan of Dean's since I was like...10.
So the OP has an opinion, that's his choice. What pisses me off is how he expressed it, and how others in this thread are quite ready to point out why their opinion is clearly right and everyone else is a moron for disagreeing.
I also find it hard to believe that so many of you would say Lance Storm is a terrible in ring worker, and then would go on to praise John Cena who gave us such gems as:
All because Cena is more popular and a, quote unquote, better entertainer. Makes it quite evident you have zero clue what you're talking about. There's a fine distinction between good entertainer and good in ring worker, as Headliner said. Why you people feel the need to comment when you have no clue is beyond me.