Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one? - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 10:35 AM Thread Starter
Learning to break kayfabe
 
John_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

I have no hatred for John Cena, he's a very hard worker and i respect him for that but i just feel like that one man is not always suppose to be the face of the company. there should be multiple faces of the company to showcase your product as whole, not by who vince loves cena. cena is popular and the face of the company cause vince wants him to be. this is vinces problem he needs to to cater to all audience similar to attitude era. Too many people boo cena because there is too much emphasis on him and/or he's being overused by vince.

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic221321_6.gif

The Masks Of Kane
John_101 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 10:41 AM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
tmocita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Yes. This is one of the reasons the attitude era was more successful than today's; the WWE had Austin, Rock, Taker, etc., to rely on.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using VerticalSports.Com App

TMoCita
tmocita is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 10:45 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
The Aesthetic Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 504
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

Quite obviously they should.

As soon as Cena gets irreparably injured they'll regret centering the company around him for 10 years.


And it will happen, it's just a matter of time.

It's just a matter of time!

The Aesthetic Ray is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 10:47 AM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

the champion should be the face of the company, no more no less
nevereveragainu is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 11:05 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Jerichosaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: England
Posts: 689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

Yes in case they get injured or in case a LARGE PERCENTAGE OF THE AUDIENCE doesn't like the sole face of the company.



YES! YES! YES! YES!
Jerichosaurus is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 11:08 AM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Da Alliance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Miami, Florida Posts: 999,999
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
         
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

Yes. It's more effective, just like Austin/Rock.



Da Alliance is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 11:10 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
CharliePrince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
               
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

The TRUTH of the matter is WWE needs more top HEELS than anything else.

Almost everyone on the roster is a face..

really, the only "heel" you have is BIG SHOW and for the past few weeks am thankful he's actually getting some bigtime classic heel heat from the fans which is a throwback

very seldom do you hear/feel that type of heel heat in this pg era

good vs evil sells

always have, always will

WWE needs more heels than faces..

the funny thing was Attitude Era was the opposite of the pg era.. Attitude had everyone as a heel but got cheered as faces... aka the anti-hero


CharliePrince is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 11:15 AM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Above Average's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London, Uk
Posts: 350
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

Yeah, because one person as the face of wwe becomes gets stale. Looking back to the attitude era it had The Rock and Austin.

Above Average is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 11:29 AM
I'm known as 'Scottish-Throw' when introduced by Michael Cole.
 
Scottish-Suplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 3,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
                     
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

Yes. It'd make matches a lot funner if I wast sure who was gonna win as they were both or all equal in terms of booking.


"Get up fools, this mah table now!"
Scottish-Suplex is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old 02-17-2013, 11:33 AM
Moron
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Should there be multiple faces of the WWE instead of one?

In McMahons senile mind, everybody loves Cena, the men only boo them because they are menstruating
Choc Lesnar is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome