Anybody else hate the rematch clause? - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-04-2013, 08:23 PM Thread Starter
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Anybody else hate the rematch clause?

Title says everything.

If you somehow don't know what it is, it's where you're guaranteed a rematch if you lose your belt.

I know it's been around for longer than most of us can remember but with all the bad fueds now, I hate it. Having to see Punk vs Rock 2 sucks and having to see more Big Show is even worse.
LyotoDragonMachida is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-04-2013, 08:28 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
         
Re: Anybody else hate the rematch clause?

Nope, I love CM Punk.
Perfect.Insanity is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-04-2013, 08:35 PM Thread Starter
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Anybody else hate the rematch clause?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfect.Insanity View Post
Nope, I love CM Punk.
I did as a face but do you really wanna see him wrestle the Rock again? I'd rather him just cut a short satalite promo and let the big gold belt headline for once.
LyotoDragonMachida is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-04-2013, 08:37 PM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
JasonCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Needle Park
Posts: 1,925
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Anybody else hate the rematch clause?

the idea is pretty bad. They use it on random matches and it never really leads to anything but a heel saying "BUT...I HAVE AN AUTOMATIC REMATCH CLAUSE." It's also done at very random and sporadic times.


Matt Cross Wanted Dead Not Alive.
National Wrestling Federation: The Investment
Can NBC's new stake in wrestling survive?

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/booker...nvestment.html
JasonCage is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-04-2013, 08:56 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Monday Night Raw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Boxing with God
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Anybody else hate the rematch clause?

It's a bit daft, they aren't going to drop the title after a few weeks. I can't remember the last time a meaningful title was dropped on the 'rematch clause'.
Monday Night Raw is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-04-2013, 09:03 PM Thread Starter
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Anybody else hate the rematch clause?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonCage View Post
the idea is pretty bad. They use it on random matches and it never really leads to anything but a heel saying "BUT...I HAVE AN AUTOMATIC REMATCH CLAUSE." It's also done at very random and sporadic times.
This right here!

My view on it is that's it's extended more bad fueds than good ones. Most of 2012 was nothing but Sheamus and Big Show and it was a horrible year for that belt.

It was either Big Show vs Bryan and Henry, Sheamus vs Bryan, Sheamus vs Del Rio, or Big Show vs Sheamus.
LyotoDragonMachida is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome