 |
|
01-28-2013, 02:06 PM
|
#81 (permalink)
|
|
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Best in the world: CHICAGO
Posts: 3,972
|
I agree, honestly I don't know who's next to cena in terms of star power (fulltimer).... Whoever it is there miles away.
__________________
Fav 5:
Dolph ziggler
Randy Orton
John Cena
Kane
The Shield
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:07 PM
|
#82 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,473
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevereveragainu
well if it were just Bryan vs Dolph it wouldn't be worth 40 dollars, for a much lesser price then OH WAIT wwe ppvs tend to have many more matches and a show you pay for tend to OH I DON'T KNOW HAVE OTHER MATCHES THAN THE MAIN EVENT WORTH A LOOK SEE
but then again with the lack of demand in wrestling nowadays espcially compared to football or ufc then maybe wrestling should be on ppv anymore
d'you ever think of that?
|
The thing is, WWE is doing GREAT by all standerds, yes its down for it self, but it self was an unstopable monoply, it still easily beats super bowl and other shows many times easily with out breaking a sweat.
Is it bad for it self? yes, for ppv in genreal? its doing great |
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:07 PM
|
#83 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 22
|
Re: Vince Disvalues His Company Bigtime.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdog40
Probably? The Rock is 5 times the draw Cena is and 100 times a draw that Punk will ever be.
|
you're definitely right but i didn't want to make assumptions  |
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:09 PM
|
#84 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,446
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Wrestling always has and probably always will use past stars for draws. That being said, it's not the Rock or Punk's fault that the WWE can't properly build an interesting main event division (or a good women's division, mid card division, etc.). The fault here likely is with Vince, Stephanie, and HHH and their fixation with Cena.
|
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:10 PM
|
#85 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Windy City
Posts: 1,332
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biast
CM Punk chants were louder than Rocky chats last night... just sayin'.
And I would buy a PPV with Daniel Bryan in the main event, but that's just me. Im a rare kind of wrestling fan this days, I actually like wrestling not sports entertainment. That's why I pray every day of the week for Punk and Bryan to switch to UFC/MMA and leave this retirement's home for part time wrestlers company for the good!
|
No they weren't the CM Punk chants were loud but Rocky's were louder.
And if liking matches with boring restholds for 20+ minutes makes you a rare kind of wrestling fan then I'm glad those kinds of fans are rare 
Also retirement home for part time wrestlers?
Sorry must have us confused with TNA.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:21 PM
|
#86 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 338
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHIcagoMade
And if liking matches with boring restholds for 20+ minutes makes you a rare kind of wrestling fan then I'm glad those kinds of fans are rare |
See, perfect example of a wrestling fan today.
We don't want holds, no!, we don't want technical wrestling, no!, we want The Rock to spend 80% of a match trying to catch his breath and the other 20% percent doing spinebusters and 4 punches in a row, maybe a Rock Bottom or two. That is totally watchable!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:24 PM
|
#87 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,995
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biast
See, perfect example of a wrestling fan today.
We don't want holds, no!, we don't want technical wrestling, no!, we want The Rock to spend 80% of a match trying to catch his breath and the other 20% percent doing spinebusters and 4 punches in a row, maybe a Rock Bottom or two. That is totally watchable!
|
"We don't want restholds and wrestling flow, but we also hate spot monkeys" - no one wins  |
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:27 PM
|
#88 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Posts: 641
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Is it sad that you complain too much, but yet you still watch it?
|
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:28 PM
|
#89 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 116
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biast
See, perfect example of a wrestling fan today.
We don't want holds, no!, we don't want technical wrestling, no!, we want The Rock to spend 80% of a match trying to catch his breath and the other 20% percent doing spinebusters and 4 punches in a row, maybe a Rock Bottom or two. That is totally watchable!
|
"We don't want holds, no!, we don't want technical wrestling, no!"
Why the fuck would we want to see two midgets hugging each other while rolling in the ring?
You indy marks just want a product for you to watch and you think that your opinion is the only one that matters.
__________________
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ2334
"Wrestling Forum - Where voicing your opinion on C.M Punk is trollin"
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 02:33 PM
|
#90 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 999
|
Re: It's sad that WWE has to rely on superstars from the past
Only indie marks care about Punk. EVERYONE either love or hate Cena.
__________________
HOW ORIGINAL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Has Vince Lost It?
