Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The bad neighbourhood in Hell
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Re: Who would win a modern day Brawl For All?
Er, this was a thread about mid carders.
Besides Swagger would wipe both Cena's and Henry's ass - strength is nothing without balance, which neither shows any major skill in. Lesnar has a low centre of gravity for a big guy, which is why he was a good MMA fighter - the only problem he had, was he hated being punched in the face - which lost him his balance from falling back, and then his title.
In fact, I would say, Brock should have been the MMA champion for as long as he did, except for the shear intimidation aspect over his opponents, as they became over cautious.
Also, Barrett was a bare knuckle BOXER. Not a bare knuckle fighter. Difference is, you do not strike the opponent when on the ground, the point is to knock someone out to win, not ground them.
Seriously, their are possible only four men in the WWE main roster today, who could have been MMA fighters with any success.
You will shit yourself laughing at this, but they are Swagger, Ziggler, Bryan and holy crap, I cannot believe I am saying this Santino.
Your opinions don't matter. I am right and everyone one not agreeing with me is a troll, or an idiot.
(Typical poster thought process)
Last edited by silverspirit2001; 01-21-2013 at 07:18 AM.