 |
|
01-20-2013, 10:12 AM
|
#71 (permalink)
|
|
Tiger Man
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 4,485
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
Newsflash folks, twitter is made for attention. Every tweet, no matter how funny or serious.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-20-2013, 10:25 AM
|
#72 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,027
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
Lance is old news. A fraud? Yes, but he's done some good with his earnings, so I don't entirely think the guy is an asshole worth beating way after the fact. It's over and done with already. I doubt he was the only one doping either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annihilus
It's kinda ironic considering almost every active wrestler in WWE has used steroids, including the man he's doing business with right now. If WWE had any balls they would make Punk vs Rock a lot more interesting by adding a straight edge vs steroids angle, there's a reason Rock is twice his size right now and its not because he's training harder, one of them is injecting test and the other isn't.
|
The same uninformed people who always claims every guy with slightly above average muscles is on roids. . .are doing it again it seems. You do this every few of weeks with a different wrestler dude.
The Rock is nearly half a foot taller than Punk with a much larger natural body frame. He would look noticeably bigger even if he didn't work out at all. And yes, if you work out a lot, you gain muscle mass even if you don't use roids. If you don't work out much at all, you don't gain muscle mass. This is why the two people look so different, not because of roids. Apparently this is still news to you though.
Lastly, there's no way The Rock would allow a steroid angle like that. Completely destroy his image for no reason? Awful, unrealistic idea.
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 10:37 AM
|
#73 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 229
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJD
They are all easy targets, Chris Brown and Lance Armstrong were being bashed by pretty much everybody when he called them out, the Catholic Church is hated by pretty much everybody. It's easy to call a villain a villain.
|
you sure about that italy,the republic of Ireland Mexico and a few other countries disagree
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 12:13 PM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Crossrhodes
Posts: 1,497
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
I like Punk very much, but he's a major douche.
__________________

Dashing no more.
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 01:29 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
|
|
Humbled
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 181
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slimm Doc
How do armstrong's kids taste in your mouth fella?
Armstrong is a pussy. Truth hurts.
|
Lance Armstrong is better than CM Punk, that's a fact.
Despite getting sued massively and losing some of his millions, this guy will never know who a CM Spunk is despite the guy throwing his name around in his mouth.
Lance Armstrong could also like previously mentioned, beat this guys ass. Seriously, I would place money on Armstrong to beat the out of shape loud mouths ass.
I love how someone so beneath Armstrong is throwing his name around. Armstrong could probably care less that some carnival worker is calling him out.
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 01:31 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
I could find a million things wrong with Punk.
I don't like him at all as a person. He embodies everything I despise in a person politically and religiously. But I like his character on TV.
__________________
Last edited by PG Era Sucks : 01-20-2013 at 01:36 PM.
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
|
Monterey Jack
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Windy City
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
It'd be more of a shock if good guy Will Smith said it.
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 01:54 PM
|
#78 (permalink)
|
|
Won a match against SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,425
|
An 8 page thread about a CM Punk tweet. How amazing.
__________________
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 02:02 PM
|
#79 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 697
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
That cheap pop on twitter lawls
|
|
|
01-20-2013, 02:14 PM
|
#80 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,518
|
Re: CM Punk's tweet about Lance Armstrong
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinJackal
The same uninformed people who always claims every guy with slightly above average muscles is on roids. . .are doing it again it seems. You do this every few of weeks with a different wrestler dude.
The Rock is nearly half a foot taller than Punk with a much larger natural body frame. He would look noticeably bigger even if he didn't work out at all. And yes, if you work out a lot, you gain muscle mass even if you don't use roids. If you don't work out much at all, you don't gain muscle mass. This is why the two people look so different, not because of roids. Apparently this is still news to you though.
|
that would be you thats uninformed.. typical hero worship, you don't want to think that the people you idolize use steroids, you want to imagine they're better than us mere mortals. Not the case. I work in sports nutrition, i've lifted weights myself for 8+ years myself, I train with people who use steroids and people who don't, I know what someone looks like when they're on the juice and when they're not, there are natural limits the human body will not go beyond due to testosterone and testosterone alone.
You CANNOT build muscle past a certain point naturally and stay lean at the same time without raising your test levels. Simply doesn't happen, its a matter of biology. Someone who doesn't use steroids and gets to 250+ will look like a powerlifter, they'll have a lot of mass but also gain fat in the process and lose definition. Only on roids can a person just gain lean mass and no fat.
Rock gained a massive amount of size at age 40 and stayed lean, that does not happen by simply working out alone. You don't know anything about bodybuilding if you think its normal for a person to be bigger AND leaner at 40 than they were in their prime when he had peak natural testosterone levels. I can also safely assume you've never bulked up to any significant weight in your life if you think what its possible to go from ~220 to 260 like Rock did, at age 40, and get leaner in the process without roids.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|