 |
|
01-13-2013, 02:56 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calabria Italy
Posts: 624
|
Re: IWC cliches
Ima just gonna head on over to Bleacher Report to find some
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-13-2013, 03:10 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
HE'S FAT
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7,807
|
Re: IWC cliches
Dam I hate this babyface, he sucks!
Dam I love this heel, he's the best shit ever!
__________________

|
|
|
01-13-2013, 03:20 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Support Austin Aries!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,755
|
Re: IWC cliches
A Scrub Is A Guy We Think Is Fly: People in the IWC obsess over their own, special Dark Match Darling "Who gives a fuck?" wrestler and mark for him while hating the top 5 guys in the promotion.
Every time spring cleaning happens, Scrub-marks come out the woodwork and tell everyone how Vince McMahon personally shoveled sand into their vaginas when some absolute irrelevancy who hasn't been on RAW or Smackdown or PPVs in 2 years is cut.
"HOW COULD YOU! HOW COULD YOU CUT THE SCRUB I MARK FOR?!"
Added Cliche:
Turn, Turn, Turn:
If the IWC booked shit, we'd have more turns than Vince Russo.
Everybody needs to turn. The face to heel, the heel to face, the most clearly evil or good person on the roster should be a "tweener." As soon as the guy turns...
Complain about the turn.
I remember the majority of the people on this forum wanting The Miz to go face for at least a year. He went face. Now we aren't even 3 months into the turn...
TURN THE MIZ HEEL AGAIN!
You just know if WWE did that, IWC would cut its nuts off for having people turn too often without good reason.
Last edited by SPCDRI : 01-13-2013 at 03:28 PM.
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 03:36 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 356
|
Re: IWC cliches
8/10 (typical women wrestling quote)
__________________
Niiiiiiiice. I had a 12 year old kid in MSG tell me he drinks! I told him he was stupid, ugly and had no friends. © CM Punk
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 04:07 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 888
|
Re: IWC cliches
Yeah so I don't see how it's appropriate to the thread or just responsible behavior to claim that someone seems either gay but repressed, or has been sexually abused from their posts. Sort of seems like the two of you are ganging up on this 'kid', which is not so fun to read. Anyway, I guess I would say the heel turn claims since it happens for jsut about everybody. Also, I realize it is only a very small portion of the IWC on this website specfically, but I am quite tired of hearing those few assholes rant and rave about Jinder Mahal. He has a cool name, and he kind of looks like a real life person from the lion king movie. Other than that eh.
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
Working on my abs
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,963
|
Re: IWC cliches
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevereveragainu
contact sports are not for children, whichever way you spin it WRESTLING IS AT ITS CORE A SPORT
in the 21st century if its for kids then its potential goes down the tube apparantly
things change and sometimes they really just should even if they don't
|
It's a television show for entertainment, not a sport. There's fighting and contact in stuff like Power Rangers, or cartoons like Powerpuff Girls. Even Looney Tunes. Doesn't change the fact that it's for kids.
Wrestlers are booked like heroes. John Cena, Sheamus, etc, are basically real life super heroes for kids. That's their purpose. That's what Hulk Hogan was too. That's what Bret Hart was. It's quite obviously aimed at kids. You may not want to admit it for still watching it as an adult male, but that doesn't change the target audience of the show being kids. It doesn't make you a loser for still watching it and liking it, so relax.
There are times when pro wrestling is not aimed at young kids, but instead teen and early/mid 20's males, such as TNA, WCW, and attitude/ruthless aggression era WWE, but WWE currently is aimed at kids. It's always been aimed at kids with the exception of the AE and RAE as I just mentioned.
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 04:57 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 342
|
Re: IWC cliches
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinJackal
It's a television show for entertainment, not a sport. There's fighting and contact in stuff like Power Rangers, or cartoons like Powerpuff Girls. Even Looney Tunes. Doesn't change the fact that it's for kids.
Wrestlers are booked like heroes. John Cena, Sheamus, etc, are basically real life super heroes for kids. That's their purpose. That's what Hulk Hogan was too. That's what Bret Hart was. It's quite obviously aimed at kids. You may not want to admit it for still watching it as an adult male, but that doesn't change the target audience of the show being kids. It doesn't make you a loser for still watching it and liking it, so relax.
There are times when pro wrestling is not aimed at young kids, but instead teen and early/mid 20's males, such as TNA, WCW, and attitude/ruthless aggression era WWE, but WWE currently is aimed at kids. It's always been aimed at kids with the exception of the AE and RAE as I just mentioned.
|
He isn't an adult male mate, he is a strange kid trolling attention. It's been noted by a few people now.
Wrestling has ALWAYS been aimed at kids, even if coupled with other demographics. Even in the Attitude era, you had the edited Saturday morning shows, and toys in the toy stores. To think any other way is stupid. "Contact sports are not for children" is a hilariously deluded quote though.
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 07:18 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
Dr. of Thuganomics
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Everywhere in the middle of nowhere
Posts: 1,889
|
Re: IWC cliches
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinJackal
Constantly claiming a wrestler sucks despite evidence of the contrary, and despite any advances in skills or character. For example, at least 90% of the forum was shitting on Morrison before and after he got fired. Possibly even 95%. Most were too timid to even post that he was good because you'd get blasted by 5 or 6 other posters.
Most of the forum never gave him any props at all. Now many people are on his nuts to come back because now that he's gone they realize how good he was. All because they're too narrow-minded to give anyone a chance since they go into it thinking they suck to begin with due to other IWC members.
|
I'm guilty of doing this. I used to shit on Morrison because it was the "cool thing to do" and because of him snubbing Trish Stratus at WrestleMania 27. But I do think hes a great talent that gets overlooked by a lot of people. His matches with CM Punk, Rey Mysterio, and Sheamus were great, especially his performance at the 2011 Elimination Chamber PPV. Even that match had with Evan Bourne on ECW had me going "Holy shit, this guy has talent".
He is a great talent that I wouldn't mind seeing back in the WWE.
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 08:01 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,805
|
Re: IWC cliches
"Back in the Attitude Era...".
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevereveragainu
1)wrestling isn't for kids
2)if people enjoy something FOR THE WRONG REASONS then there is a problem here, investmenet, potential and manpower in wrestling is finite
3)also, what's a nerd?
|
1. Wrestling has always been for kids.
2. People can enjoy whatever they want for whatever reason they want. You being such an elitist just shows how much of a tool you are.
3.You're not funny.
__________________
Sig Credit: AVRO
Check out the spoilers for a good laugh.
|
|
|
01-13-2013, 08:04 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
Dr. of Thuganomics
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Everywhere in the middle of nowhere
Posts: 1,889
|
Re: IWC cliches
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevereveragainu
WRESTLING IS AT ITS CORE A SPORT
|

|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|