Does WWE need a convincing authority figure? - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:30 AM Thread Starter
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
MOUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: U.K
Posts: 279
Points: 0
   
Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

Personally i think it either needs a convincing one like a HHH, Any McMahon or a member of the board of directors, OR not bother having one at all because with AJ and Vickie at the helm i think the product is suffering.
I know its not the only problem with WWE at the moment but do you think it would help the current product with a convincing authority figure? or none at all?

<a href="http://s938.photobucket.com/user/owenm1990/media/image.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/ad222/owenm1990/image.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo image.jpg"/></a>
MOUK is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:35 AM
Searching for a new identity
 
peowulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,882
Points: 216
                     
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

Exactly. A convincing one, or none at all. Vickie Guerrero and AJ before her are just wasting time. John Laurinaitis was better, but still, TNA has Hulk Hogan, step it up people.
peowulf is offline  
post #3 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:35 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
N-destroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 779
Points: 0
   
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

Agreed with everything you said. The problem is Vince Mcmahon constantly returning and undermining Vickie's authority onscreen which serves no purpose at all.

They either need a convincing one or not have one at all.

N-destroy is offline  
post #4 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:37 AM
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,689
Points: 258
                     
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

No, I don't think it does. I think it's a massively played concept now, unfortunately.

I think that a commissioner perhaps would be beneficial to make the matches that we "want to see", but an authoritarian figure along the ilk of HHH/McMahon/Laurinitus and AJ/Teddy/Booker/Vickie is not needed unless you go with it 100%. I want someone such a Vince in the late 90s who uses Wrestler A to go against Wrestler B who is trying to kill his company/show, not Triple H exclaiming, even as the 'boss', he could out-wrestle everyone on the roster and killing them by saying a brush would do a better job in the ring.

I must admit I liked Laurinitus in the role as it had an air of legitimacy that none since McMahon have had, however I think in killing that they killed the role completely.

TWITTER: @WRITEJOEWRITE
Click HERE & register for Free Stuff from Amazon



Throw The BOOK At Me
For Wrestling Forum's all things book and reading related discussion group, please click HERE.
(and join our fortnightly Book Club HERE.)

Issues_Sunshyne is offline  
post #5 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:39 AM
GET MY BAGS
 
HeatWave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Hall
Posts: 9,364
Points: 0
                     
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

WWE doesn't need an authority figure period...It just leads to more questions than answers when they have someone in charge because there's always something that goes down that never makes sense and if they ever did have one voice, no matter who that voice would be, they should never be a focal point of the show..
HeatWave is offline  
post #6 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:44 AM
Searching for a new identity
 
peowulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,882
Points: 216
                     
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

Yeah, the thing is we don't need a general manager to come out and announce every single unimportant tag team main event each week. Have them come out for important stuff. At least get someone credible like Booker T on Raw. Teddy/Vickie can "run" Smackdown.
peowulf is offline  
post #7 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:45 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
N-destroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 779
Points: 0
   
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Issues_Sunshyne View Post
No, I don't think it does. I think it's a massively played concept now, unfortunately.

I think that a commissioner perhaps would be beneficial to make the matches that we "want to see", but an authoritarian figure along the ilk of HHH/McMahon/Laurinitus and AJ/Teddy/Booker/Vickie is not needed unless you go with it 100%. I want someone such a Vince in the late 90s who uses Wrestler A to go against Wrestler B who is trying to kill his company/show, not Triple H exclaiming, even as the 'boss', he could out-wrestle everyone on the roster and killing them by saying a brush would do a better job in the ring.

I must admit I liked Laurinitus in the role as it had an air of legitimacy that none since McMahon have had, however I think in killing that they killed the role completely.
In short, you want a heel Authority Figure.

N-destroy is offline  
post #8 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:48 AM
You just got Litt the hell up
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 5,383
Points: 208
                     
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

No authority figure. If something needs sorting out, have it done off screen and say the WWE Board of Directors booked/ordered the match/segment to take place. If something needs to happen on screen, have Vince show up or HHH, but use them sparingly so when they do show up you know shit is going to go down. Authority figures are overplayed and have been irrelevant since 2006, IMO.

Flux is offline  
post #9 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:55 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Post-Modern Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,082
Points: 45
             
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

It doesn't matter how badass the supposed authority figure looks when pretty much everyone liberally breaks the rules every week with no real consequences. That's why they should just scrap the whole archtype altogether.
Post-Modern Devil is offline  
post #10 of 27 (permalink) Old 12-13-2012, 09:55 AM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
Duke Silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,194
Points: 6
                     
Re: Does WWE need a convincing authority figure?

WWE needs an authority figure that can talk on the mic. Other than Hunter, we haven't had a GM with mic skills since Regal in 2008.

Mike Adamle, Vicki Guerrero, celebrity GMs, Anonymous/Hornswoggle GM, Johnny Ace, AJ, and Vicki again. That list comprises 90% of the GMs over the past four and a half years. What the actual fuck!
Duke Silver is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome