Would one World Title really be better for WWE? - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 11-16-2012, 06:57 AM   #11 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,096
nevereveragainu is an after thoughtnevereveragainu is an after thought
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrestling immortal View Post
ive been reading this forum the last few months, and people have recommended switching back to only one world championship, but if you think about it, would it really be better for the company. Heres my thoughts:

switching back to one title could help them build the mid card a hell of a lot better, then it is now, you have a really crappy midcard roster of wrestlers which are supported with lack of storyline and poor booking. The talent in the mid card is great though, there many future champions in this company.

there would be less imidiate pushing for the world title, over the last 5 years this has been a habit which really has killed many wrestlers in the long term, we had guys like jack swaggers, sheamus and alberto del rio winning the world title in a very short period of time, and other guys like wade barret, tensai etc getting pushed to the moon with no meaning, and in the long term suffered from it, sheamus suffered after his first world title reign, but now is back to the top, jack swagger really plummeted from the top after his reign, alberto delrio no one really cares about him now after this year after losing so many times to sheamus, tensai is now a jobber really.

lets start with the negatives, i really dont believe they can switch to one world title, mainly because of how large the roster is, it is a lot larger then tna, so i dont think they can go back to one title.

the guys deserving pushes such as sheamus, daniel bryan, wade barret etc would barely ever get a push to the world title if you ask me, john cena as the face of the company he would probably get the world title at least once a year. and these guys as said before sheamus, daniel bryan,christian, etc would probably not get too many opportunities to win the world title. I honestly dont think guys like sheamus,miz and christian would be a world champion yet if there was only one title.

i think they would have to cut one of the brands off, if they did this most likely smackdown, because you cant have two brands, with one brand having no world title, and having nothing to show that somebody is on the top if they arent holding a world title.

i would personally say i wouldnt cut it into one world title, because mainly of the john cena reason and also because of the size of the roster.
my friend, titles are good when LITTLE TO NO-ONE holds them, they are suppposed to be on the best and only the best

opputunities?! TITLES DON'T MAKE WRESTLERS CREDIBLE, IT TAKES WRESTLERS TO MAKE WORLD TITLE CREDIBLE

talk to anyone outside of the pro wrestling bubble and they get turned off immediantly because unless it something simple for the sake of quality control like "The Heavyweight title" and the "Super heavyweight title" two world titles dishonor the idea of titles existing to begin with

I DONT CARE THAT ITS BECAUSE WWE HAVE TWO DIFFERENT SCHEDULES IT DOESNT MAKE IT RIGHT

Last edited by nevereveragainu : 11-16-2012 at 07:05 AM.
nevereveragainu is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 11-16-2012, 07:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Smif-N-Wessun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 36 Chambers
Posts: 1,420
Smif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friendsSmif-N-Wessun needs to make some friends
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

The 2 world title format doesn't work when one of them is pretty much the equivalent to what the IC title was back in the day. The roster these days isn't deep enough for two world titles anyway.

Also, throwing world title reigns at midcarders is a horrible way to build them up. Yeah, it works sometimes, but for every Daniel Bryan, there's a Jack Swagger, Del Rio, Ezekiel Jackson, and Khali.
__________________

^furious, projects self-image onto others^

Quote:
Originally Posted by MVP
“Kevin Nash is right. Smaller guys don’t draw. I mean who would pay any money to watch itty bitty guys like Mayweather or Paquiao?"
Talent/charisma draws. Not size.
Smif-N-Wessun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:15 AM   #13 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Luis Magalhaes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,033
Luis Magalhaes should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsLuis Magalhaes should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsLuis Magalhaes should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsLuis Magalhaes should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsLuis Magalhaes should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

The brand split is better
__________________

I don't love John Cena, in fact I don't even like him. But I hate the idea that he is the worst! Cena doesn't bury talents. Talents go down the card after Cena because feuding with Cena... is the highlight of their career. Deal with it.





Everything I say is my opinion, not a fact.
English is not my native language.
Luis Magalhaes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:20 AM   #14 (permalink)
Best For Business
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,901
Starbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREWStarbuck is new to the CHATBOX CREW
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

They originally split the roster and brought in a second world title because they had TOO much talent on their hands. Now that couldn't be further from the truth. They don't have ENOUGH talent. They book SD stars on Raw, there are no clear cut divisions in the card, they don't treat either title with the respect it deserves, the WWE title plays second fiddle to Cena and the WHC plays third fiddle to those 2. I think combining the rosters and the title is a great idea right now. Go back and start from scratch. Get rid of the guys who are taking up space and not doing anything/not ready. Send them back to developmental and call them up when they are ready. One title and one roster means less spots at the top. No more coasting. I also think it will mean the return of guys actually moving up the card, through the divisions to get to the top level again, they way it used to be. If they can book one world title and one roster when they had Rock, Austin, HHH, Taker, Foley, Kane, HBK, Bret, Angle and the list goes on then they can sure as hell do it with what they have now. Then in a few years when they sort their shit out, hopefully they'll be at the stage where they'll be forced to split things again.

Everybody talks about the start of a new era and all that shit. I don't even think it needs to be something that substantial. The entire product is stale as shit right now. It's tired and redundant. If they just gutted the whole thing and started making changes, meaningful changes, I think the difference would be staggering tbh. When Vince first announced the draft it was a HUGE deal. If they had him or even HHH come out and announce this, the merging of the rosters and the unification of the world titles to kick of another new era, I think it would be great and really refreshing.

/rant over lol.
__________________
Oderint Dum Metuant

Let Them Hate So Long As They Fear
Starbuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:31 AM   #15 (permalink)
21-0
 
Hennessey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,390
Hennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friends
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

I don't mind having two world titles. There are a lot of talented guys that would never become world champion if we only had one title. Does anybody really think Daniel Bryan would ever have become champion if we only had one title?

I also think the WWE needs to switch shows for the titles, so they show that both titles are equal. Just like in 2008.
Hennessey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:34 AM   #16 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: *Insert a joke instead of the actual location*
Posts: 2,319
Adyman should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsAdyman should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsAdyman should be embarassed if they have more than 50 postsAdyman should be embarassed if they have more than 50 posts
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

Get rid of SD! and WHC. Who's with me?
Adyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:43 AM   #17 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 664
wrestling immortal is in rep purgatory
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparta101 View Post
I don't mind having two world titles. There are a lot of talented guys that would never become world champion if we only had one title. Does anybody really think Daniel Bryan would ever have become champion if we only had one title?

I also think the WWE needs to switch shows for the titles, so they show that both titles are equal. Just like in 2008.
daniel bryan would of been champion eventually i bet, like a chris benoit and eddie guerrero way of putting in hard work.
wrestling immortal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:51 AM   #18 (permalink)
21-0
 
Hennessey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,390
Hennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friendsHennessey needs to make some friends
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrestling immortal View Post
daniel bryan would of been champion eventually i bet, like a chris benoit and eddie guerrero way of putting in hard work.
So it would have taken him 15-20 years to get the title? And how many talented guys has there been that have been in the WWE for years, and never won the title.
Hennessey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:00 AM   #19 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 664
wrestling immortal is in rep purgatory
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparta101 View Post
So it would have taken him 15-20 years to get the title? And how many talented guys has there been that have been in the WWE for years, and never won the title.
yeah i guess ur right about this, this was largely the case in the 80's and 1990's, with many legends not holding the world title mr perfect etc. i could see many guys not being champion had it be only 1 title guys like the miz,big show, mark henry,christian etc. But i really think that winning the world heavyweight title these days has lost its prestige and doesnt mean as much because of they way they just pass it around to guys like swagger and del rio etc, i remember when benoit won the world title in 2004 it felt so big to the fans
wrestling immortal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 09:02 AM   #20 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 664
wrestling immortal is in rep purgatory
Default Re: would one world title really be better for wwe?

and adding to the fact how guys have like 10 world title reigns, you john cenas, triple h means nothing compared to when it had one title. after hearing the opinions of everyone i do beleive now that 1 title would be better
wrestling immortal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios