wrestling immortal

So do you guys love or hate the money in the bank concept?

I absolutely hate it now, it seems like its just another concept designed to create a new world champ every year i mean who's the next money in the bank winner next year, kingston? r-truth maybe?

i would admit that when it first came out i thought it was great idea i liked it for the first few years i was really happy when edge and rvd won it and got their world titles, but now seeing it over the last 4 years it does make the world titles feel like nothing these days, having heaps of guys not deserving to win the world title. I mean how long does ziggler want to take to cash it in seriously, it has created transitional champions in the past such as jeff hardy winning the title and cm punk cashing in or big show losing the world title last year.

And creating two money in the bank matches for each brand has just killed the world titles meaning.

tell us what you guys think.

FredForeskinn

It should go back to Mania.

TomasThunder619

It was better when it was at Wrestlemania. The match itself was better, more memorable and more important.

__________________


Mascara de la Muerte in PWA

StonecoldGoat

It was Better at Wrestlemania.WWE just needs to get rid of Gimmick PPV's.They ruined Hell in a Cell Concept.

__________________

gothmog 3rd

IMO they can still keep the PPV, but just one briefcase, and of course book the match better. I like the conept, but I would like it better if more established guys won it most of the time. How wierd is it that once you have 2 world title reigns to your name it becomes impossible to win MitB? It would make it a lot more realistic (the best win) and it would make it feel more special when a nobody wins.

__________________
Does anyone else think Zack Ryder should change the name of his finisher to FaceRape?

Marking list:

1. Randy Orton
2. The Shield
3. Mark Henry
4. Brock Lesnar
5. Kane
6. Alberto Del Rio (heel)
7. CM God
8. Dolph Ziggler
9. Chris Jericho
10. Big Show

TehBrain

The match has been played out forever now. Just like the Hell in a Cell. I remember when HIAC first came out, it was special and new and inventive and cool.. Then there was the 30th one... I also remember The hardy's dudley's and e&c in the first TLC, and how mind blowing it was.. every one since has been a let down.

__________________

hardysno1fan

Honestly I got bored after Edge did the screw thing twice. It was a great idea y2j but its been overused and its novelty warned off. I wouldn't mind it going back to WM or a bi-annual MItB ppv with just 1 briefcase but 2 is just too much .

BANKSY

The worst concept in the business right now and the reason they can't create real stars as they just use this lame shortcut method of moving someone up the card. Also this moronic idea the writers have in that cause a superstar has the briefcase they can be a jobber cause they will be champion sometime down the road.

The matches aren't even up to the standard anymore (see this years MITB).

__________________

hardysno1fan

I too accede. It is a very slothful way to promote somebody, especially when the fans know he's going to be the champion and conventionally in a heel tactic.

new_year_new_start

No. Kill it with fire!!

__________________