Re: How bad is WWE currently?
The booking is really awful except for some points. I don't get why they do not change anything (they would get much more money if they did). Too many are dissatisfied with WWE this days. They say, they listen to the so called WWE UNIVERSE, but that's bu****it. They ruin tallents, book boring matches, script predictable storylines and even fail good ones.
Tag team division has become rather interesting recently, but after HIAC I predict it to become boring. HIAC is created to finish storilines. So Team Rhodes Scholars doesn't get a rematch? A great fail in the end of a good push for two great wrestlers. Kane&Bryan as a team are still nice to watch, but Bryan is much much better than Kane nowadays and it's obvious, so losing interest in them is just a matter of 1 or 2 shows.
What about WWE's babyfaces? Randy is so boring. He's unpredictable RKO is so predictable everytime. The storyline with Barrett gave a good push for Barrett, whom I like a lot, so may be this is a resonable feud. But what about Randy? Remember him in jaw-dropping mathes? The last interesting one was with Christian, but that was long ago. Alberto Del Rio is also a good talent, but all I can remember about him is his cars (And that's sad). World Heavyweight Championship Story line between Show And Sheamus made me fall asleep. Show is acting greatly (Sheamus is not), so Show deserves a title. But what about Dolph? One of the most athletic, most talented superstars after getting a GREAT push in a feud with Jericho gets where? Eah, You're right. Nowhere, he's just running around with a blue briefcase, which he should cash in, but WWE has other plans as always. I don't like Cena much, but he can make memorable matches and i like watching him wrestle and talk, BUT NOT GET INTO THE STORYLINE with an 18-year old girl who is accused of... You know that sh**ty storyline. All general managers totally suck. A strange feud between Ryback and Punk. It's made just to fullfill the time with something before the comeback of Rock. Because you don't put a potential champion in a match against JTG the day after the mainevent of a pay-per-view. And now about my favourite wrestler in WWE: Punk. It was rather predictable when WWE turned him into a heel, but that's OK. It was rather intriguing when he bacame a Paul Heyman Guy. It was cool when he had a match against the boss to remind us of what AE was capable of. But what's in the end? Nothing again. No unpredictable results in HIAC. Why the hell does WWE put him with Heyman for? Now it seems unreasonable. And no WWE championship match will happen in a month or even more. May be WWE should bring back not Foley, but Lesnar for example. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY PREDICTABLE AND THAT STILL WOULD HAVE BEEN GREAT. DON'T YOU AGREE? But that would cost a sum of money, I think, so f**K the WWE UNiverse, let us watch a referee low-blow UNDEFITED RYBACK. Couldn't have been much worse..
I have written all these, because I'm a wrestling fan, and I am persuaded to skip 3/4 of the show in order to find something, at least something that I would find interesting. So the short answer to the question: HOW BAD IS WWE? - Worser than ever.