Wrestling Forum banner

Your Unpopular Opinions?

552K views 4K replies 1K participants last post by  The Dazzler 
#1 ·
Shoot. :gun:
 
#3,349 ·
This growing trend of arguing over who had the louder of pops is extremely asinine and just a tool to create an uneeded "mark war" or give some self vindication in one's belief that x wrestler is better than y. If you think about it, it is pretty dumb how far some will go just so they can clarify that Dwayne Johnson may have elicited a response that is slightly louder than Steve Austin when comparing x nights. We can all hear, some better than others, but either a wrestler gets the crowd erupting in energy or not damnit. No one should give a rats ass if the response to Daniel Bryan turning on the Wyatt family is a bigger response than the one Rock received when he returned monday. Both were nice ways to inject energy and generated loud noise. Some people should get over this petty crap though obviously many of us do not.
 
#3,394 ·
Cena does not bury people. Cena does not halt momentum. Cena does not hog the spotlight.

The incompetent fuckface known as Vincent Kennedy McMahon likes to put all his eggs into one basket and shoehorn Cena into everything. Cena doesn't stand in the back watching someone popular in the ring getting cheered on a monitor and say "Oh boy I gotta get me some of them cheers!" and then runs out. You can make an argument he's too much of a company man and might not put his foot down enough and say "Hey Vince, maybe I should sit this one out" but can we please stop saying "CENA BURIES PEOPLE CENA WANTS TO BE IN EVERYTHING CENA HATES WHEN SOMEONE ELSE GETS OVER"?
 
#3,404 ·
Speak for yourself. You can have the opinion that he didn't matter, but some of us got comfortable with and enjoyed certain individuals being a part of the WWE, even if they weren't a main, crucial part of it.

I loved his announcing, certainly better than Eden and imho was better than Lillian Garcia as well, and yeah I really did care and do care.

See this is what I never got about Punk. He clearly wanted to be the top dog, the main go to guy, the face of the company (It was defo more than just a gimmick) but he didn't wanna accept the celebrity lifestyle that comes with it? Dunno what world he was living in.

Anyway he certainly doesn't owe any one other than Vince anything i agree with you there.
His own little delusional world where he's somehow this godly, untouchable thing. That's the only logic I can see in it - he wants fans' money, wants the support so he can be a top guy, wanted all this, but then felt he was too good to be affiliated with the people who made him big. Smh.
 
#3,431 ·
Hello all,

I am writing to express one of my 'unpopular opinions' as you may call it.

Daniel Bryan.

Is anyone else sick of looking at the same thing revolved around the concept of 'underdog'?Well I, for one, am totally bored of this. Whilst I do understand that the company needs people like Daniel Bryan for the fans to get behind and interact with, I think that it is super-stale.

Does anybody else agree?

Yours faithfully,

LIMITED
 
#3,447 ·
CM Punk has completely ruined his legacy with the way he has handled things with WWE. I hope they stand firm and he never comes back although i freely admit i would mark at a surprise return.

Today's kids will look back in 10,15 years and talk about Rollins the way we talk about HBK.
 
#3,550 ·
Anyone who says Trish Stratus was the was a pioneer in women's wrestling needs to take some history lessons. Yes she was the first with longevity, but she wasn't the pioneer of anything in women's wrestling. Between Medusa, Sunny, Sable, Marlena and Chyna (not to mention Jaqueline, Tori etc), sexual attractiveness and in-ring athletic ability were covered.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top