Re: Where would the undertakers character be if there was no kane?
More or less the same place id imagine
Kane's entire existence is defined by Undertaker. Its the entire reason Kane lasted so long despite being just a monster like gonzales or sid or bundy. on the other hand, Kane is merely an undertaker side character
That being said, the kane vs Taker feud and later brothers of destruction runs were huge at the time. Major part of the attitude era.
But Undertaker was an established main eventer, major draw and guaranteed to have been a major part of future as a star and legend, with or without Kane. However would he have been as big of a star? I dont know, as im not fucking psychic