Re: Which PG era wrestler would find success in AE?
The Best in the World of course, your WWE Champion of 323 consecutive days, CM Punk. He would have been a main eventer in the attitude era too, there, I said it.
The thought of an Austin/Punk feud in 1998 has me salivating, Punk truly is a guy that is wrestling in the wrong era.
Re: Which PG era wrestler would find success in AE?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickyboy123
no just no... austin punk would have nothing on austin mchmahon
He never compared it to Austin/McMahon though. Nor said Punk/Austin would be better than it just that it would have been godly in its own sense...Which it would hae
Anyway yeah Punk & maybe Orton would work. Bryan would make a great midcarder in that era too but wouldnt break the main event scene for sure.
Re: Which PG era wrestler would find success in AE?
Zack Ryder would've been an entertaining midcarder. His current character is like the "kid friendly version of an Attitude Era character". He'd probably have the same gimmick, except with more references to clubbing, partying, drinking, and sex.
Re: Which PG era wrestler would find success in AE?
Punk would have been a main eventer and probably be higher in the card than he is today. Bryan, Sandow and possibly Ziggler would be upper-midcarders. Slater, Cena, Del Rio and Hunico would be regulars in the midcard. Prime Time Players would probably be in tag-team contention with AW as their manager. Otunga would be in Right To Censor or play a similar role and would probably have about the same status that he does today. Ryder and Santino would probably be about the same too. Sheamus might be a lower-midcard/tag-team guy. Other than that I doubt anyone would have really got anywhere, at least not with their current gimmicks.
__________________
Quote:
Bo Dallas @TheBoDallas #RAW Mark Henry is back and looks ready to destoy !