Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 07-31-2012, 03:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Jammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,753
Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy Jammy
Default Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

article - http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/ar...259.php#page-1

Excerpts -

She's the candidate with her own ticker symbol: WWE. (On Linda)

But Wall Street is not nearly as bullish about World Wrestling Entertainment as the at-times fawning Republican base has been here in Connecticut about Linda McMahon, the company's former chief executive and repeat contender for U.S. Senate.

Since McMahon's first run two years ago, WWE's stock price has plunged from $18.64 to $7.86 per share, hurting not just garden variety investors but also the first family of wrestling, which owns 46 million of the wrestling empire's 75 million shares on a fully diluted basis.

That translates to a loss of a half-billion dollars, 10 times more than the $50 million McMahon spent the last time on her unsuccessful candidacy.

"To me, it's indicative that maybe the McMahons care more about winning this Senate seat than their shareholders," said Peter Schiff, the brash money manager and talking head from Weston who lost a three-way Republican Senate primary to McMahon in 2010.
- * -

"Linda no longer works for WWE," Murtaugh wrote by email to Greenwich Time. "If you want to talk about the company, you should call them."

Murtaugh subsequently released a statement Friday to the newspaper heralding McMahon's tenure at the WWE, which ended in September 2009 when she ceded the reins of the company to her husband, Vince McMahon.

Murtaugh used the opportunity to take a swipe at former U.S. Rep. Christopher Murphy, D-5th District, the favorite to face McMahon in the general election.

"Linda built a successful business from the ground up," Murtaugh said. "She went from sharing a desk with her husband to employing more than 600 Connecticut residents. This is in stark contrast to Chris Murphy, who has created no jobs in the private sector."

Murphy spokesman Ben Marter railed on McMahon's corporate record.

"McMahon's attacks are just designed to distract voters from her miserable record of mistreating her employees and shipping jobs overseas," Marter said.
- * -

WWE brass attributed the lackluster performance of the company's stock, which analysts told the newspaper pays a handsome annual dividend of 60 cents per share, to a confluence of factors that included the uncertainty over television network launch and losses on film projects such as "The Reunion," "Bending The Rules" and "That's What I Am."

"Obviously, you know correlation is not causation regarding Linda's tenure here," said George Barrios, the company's chief financial officer.

- * -

Bradley Safalow, founder of Please Act Accordingly, otherwise known as PAA Research, an independent investment advisory firm based in New York City, said the communication between the WWE and its shareholders about the status of the languishing television network has been poor.

"The company is spending tens of millions on the launch and it has yet to find a distribution partner," said Safalow, who also identified film project losses as a drag on the stock.

Despite all that, Safalow has a "buy" rating on WWE stock, which has a dividend/yield of 6.3 percent.

"The core business has actually performed reasonably well in the economic environment," he said.

Safalow sees room for growth once the WWE network finally does premiere, which he said could be in the first quarter of 2013.

"I just think, in general, the enduring popularity of this business for decades is lost on the investing community," said Safalow, who described McMahon as impressive.

- * -

Dave Meltzer, the San Jose-based editor of the Wrestling Observer, said the buzz surrounding the WWE network is that it could command a monthly subscriber fee of $9.95 to $18 and feature a wide array of programming that would ordinarily be shown on a pay-per-view basis.

The concern of incorporating pay-per-view content into the new network, Meltzer said, is that could cannibalize a lucrative source of revenue for the WWE.

"The subscription model has very high risks," Meltzer said. "I think part of the reason the stock price is down is there's tremendous skepticism over the network."

Representatives for the WWE said they are in talks with the nation's 10 leading telecommunications providers about a distribution plan and could have an announcement on the network's fate in the coming months.

"I'm sure the street would like to hear some more details about it," Barrios said. "I do believe the lack of visibility has affected the stock price somewhat."

Meltzer played down Linda McMahon's personal impact on the fortunes of the WWE.

"When it was good she had nothing to do with that. When it was bad she had nothing to do with it," Meltzer said.

He credited Vince McMahon with being the driving force behind the WWE. "I never credit her for the business," Meltzer said. "That would be like George Lucas' wife running for office and saying, `I'm responsible for `Star Wars,' when maybe she did a lot of bookkeeping."
-*-

David Trainer, principal of New Constructs, a Brentwood, Tenn., investment research firm, and a former Forbes.com contributor, is still on the WWE stock bandwagon.

"Our model still shows that it's still inexpensive," Trainer said. "It's a profitable business. I think it's a low-risk stock right now."

The Wall Street veteran nevertheless wondered if the shift to PG content could play into the hands of the UFC and mixed martial arts, which he said are seen as more authentic.

"MMA to WWE could be what iPhone was to the BlackBerry. Who knows?" Trainer said.

ON PG- Rating


WWE suits scoffed at the idea that the rebranding was tied to McMahon's plan to seek office, saying that its Friday Night SmackDown series went to a PG format in 1999, with Monday Night Raw following suit in 2008.

"Honestly, I think it's almost laughable that people think that," said Michelle Wilson, the company's chief marketing officer. "Politics had nothing to do with it."


-*-
Perhaps somewhat lost in the ski slope-like freefall of the WWE stock is how it impacts the bank account of the McMahons.

"Obviously, their net worth is down substantially based on the stock price," Schiff said. "If they keep this up, I'll pass them pretty soon."

----

Highly suggest to read the full article, if you can understand Business English.
Jammy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 07-31-2012, 03:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
checking the male
 
samizayn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: B+
Posts: 9,721
samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn samizayn
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

That figure brought tears to my eyes.
__________________

samizayn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
nonamebadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: the D
Posts: 136
nonamebadger nonamebadger nonamebadger
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

#McMahonsBlameThisOnTwitter
__________________
rton
nonamebadger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
RDClip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 267
RDClip RDClip
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

And in spite of all this, they are doing little to improve the product. They need to take a gamble and try something new. Maybe surprise the fan with something unexpected.

And didn't WWE films lose 40 million last year? I think i read that only 2 WWE films out af all the films they made has ever actually made a profit. No wonder no one wants to buy shares in a company led by a guy who wastes money so easily.
__________________
RDClip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
 
4everEyebrowRaisin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,600
4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin 4everEyebrowRaisin
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

It's funny because what will they learn from this? NOTHING. They'll still put out a shitty product.

RAW switched to PG because they thought all the little kiddies would pour money into the company...well, HOW'S THAT WORKIN' OUT FOR YA, BITCH?
__________________
http://a.disquscdn.com/get?url=http%3A%2F%2Fi8.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa13%2FDisturbedShifty%2FMY%2520avatars%2520and%25  20signatures%2FRIP-Warrior.png&key=rmmmqLOaUAV_gVBRr15eIg&w=600&h=285
4everEyebrowRaisin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Independent Worm Saloon
 
Oakue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Unnamed Megacity
Posts: 5,088
Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

Good, so lose all your money, Linda loses the election, and hopefully that translates to them dumping the PG era.

I want to hear the word "ass" again dammit.
__________________
Oakue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Jeff Harvey
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 239
Fallen Sephiroth
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

It's still a pretty safe stock to buy and hold with so much being paid in dividends to wait until its network gets off the ground. If they can incorporate the Indy's (and please Dean Ambrose so his nuts can STFU), I see pretty much a global lockdown of the wrestling business in a way that helps all parties. I'm very sure that once they find out the details of distribution, WWE marks will jump on board to pay a subscription for all the PPV's that is close to XBOX live prices, and probably get a few packages deals. 150/year max for access to every PPV with Raw and Smackdown staying in syndication to draw subscribers to a product I feel will vastly improve in quality or 40+ per month for overrated PPV's that suck except 4 the Big 4 (sometimes)? Where is the question is what most fans would ask. Very ballsy, but could really pay off big in the next 10 years if done right. Unlike other sports companies that use the NCAA to farm/scout talent, fans would actually get to see this done themselves and maybe even inspire a "draft" from their favorite regions of their favorite wrestlers.
Fallen Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
The Eater of Worlds
 
Riddle101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 9,298
Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101 Riddle101
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

I actually forgot about the WWE network until I read this article. Very unwise to start it up I think. I think stock prices being down and McMahon losing $500 million is a bad omen. Just forget about it, it'll properly turn out like the XFL.
__________________
Favorite Wrestlers Of All Time - The Undertaker, The Rock, Stone Cold, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle and Edge

Riddle101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Independent Worm Saloon
 
Oakue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Unnamed Megacity
Posts: 5,088
Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue Oakue
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

I would think this is actually a good time buy stock in it. It will likely never go above $20, but it should get back up to the $15-$20 range.
__________________
Oakue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Oh brother, brother, brother
 
Necramonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,894
Necramonium Necramonium Necramonium Necramonium Necramonium Necramonium
Default Re: Freefall off WWE stock costs McMahon $500 million

Quote:
Originally Posted by RDClip View Post
And in spite of all this, they are doing little to improve the product. They need to take a gamble and try something new. Maybe surprise the fan with something unexpected.

And didn't WWE films lose 40 million last year? I think i read that only 2 WWE films out af all the films they made has ever actually made a profit. No wonder no one wants to buy shares in a company led by a guy who wastes money so easily.
And now we got the Miz starring in a new sequel of that horrible movie series The Marine.
__________________

"It's that jolt of electric anticipation as the arena lights go down. It's the first jarring chord as the music hits and the pyrotechnics erupt into sparks that fade to a sizzle. It's that moment when an iconic Superstar emerges and the crowd is instantly ignited into a deafening roar. The fans can feel the adrenaline surging through the stands and they realize they are each a part of the spectacle, a part of the phenomenon, a part of the thrill of wrestling. Each of them will forever be able to say... I Was There."
Necramonium is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios