[TJChurch]

Originally Posted by redeadening

Lesnar vs Rey and Rey vs Danielson need to happen

The latter might be nice if we could see Rey anywhere near the top of his game. No need to put him against Brock, especially while he works on borrowed time.

[JOAL.com]

Originally Posted by TJChurch

Some have one opinion, others have the other. Posts from both have gone on for almost a week. If you need either side explained, read previous posts. No need for me to repeat myself yet again (dig the redundancy of that!), let alone to try to explain an opinion I've never had.

i read your posts.

why is taker vs triple H not better than every match from 1998 to 1999?

Originally Posted by TJChurch

The latter might be nice if we could see Rey anywhere near the top of his game. No need to put him against Brock, especially while he works on borrowed time.

When rey got last injured, he was the best wrestler in the company.
I think we'll be fine

[Brye]

Rey was fucking awesome in 2011 and Taker/Trips was better than 95% or more of the time period redeadening mentioned, imo.

[TJChurch]

Originally Posted by redeadening

i read your posts.

Then I need not repeat myself.

Originally Posted by redeadening

why is taker vs triple H not better than every match from 1998 to 1999?

Because some during that time were better.

Originally Posted by redeadening

When rey got last injured, he was the best wrestler in the company.
I think we'll be fine

If one of those is true, the other automatically is. But since clearly our opinions differ much on many things, we can't be sure either is.

[TJChurch]

Originally Posted by Brye

Rey was fucking awesome in 2011 and Taker/Trips was better than 95% or more of the time period redeadening mentioned, imo.

Thank you so much for adding your opinion.

I know there have been some, but I honestly can't recall the last stretch of Rey matches where I didn't like at least one of them.

The same can be said for stretches of that HIAC & finding times I did like.

[JOAL.com]

TJ, ive had conversations with brick walls where I got more of a response. atleast there I had the faint echo of my voice

You are like the jeff jarrett of this thread

[TJChurch]

Originally Posted by redeadening

TJ, ive had conversations with brick walls where I got more of a response. atleast there I had the faint echo of my voice

You are like the jeff jarrett of this thread

I am sure you've had longer conversations with brick walls, as even they are smarter & needed to explain things to you. (Except perhaps, the one with the letters of the alphabet written-out.)

I guess I should just consider your name, & not be surprised you are obviously brain-dead.

[JOAL.com]

TJ, you seem obsessed with the concept of 'YOUR OPINION' and defending it in a pretentious way, yet at no point actually elaborating upon it, or explaining why you believe it to be true

i mean hell, austin101 called nancy a bitch, but atleast he explained his opinions

[TJChurch]

Originally Posted by redeadening

TJ, you seem obsessed with the concept of 'YOUR OPINION' and defending it in a pretentious way, yet at no point actually elaborating upon it, or explaining why you believe it to be true

i mean hell, austin101 called nancy a bitch, but atleast he explained his opinions

I am not obsessed with anything, nor am I the least bit pretentious.

I have stated & explained my opinion. Also, others who share my opinions have also given reasons. You claim to have read these posts, & yet deny to know what they said.

it seems to me you are just one of many to join the popular action here of attacking me, without reason.

[JOAL.com]

Your signature says the following

*Perhaps the least-well-liked member on these forums. I'm cool with that; Few true geniuses are appreciated in their lifetimes.

And you claim not to be pretentious?

Explain, why do you think Rey isnt a great worker anymore and why you believe that Taker vs Hunter isnt better than the majority of the 1998 to 1999 matches. Thats all I ask