Originally Posted by HayleySabin
Not at all. Story alone wiped the floor with their Summerslam encounter. Summerslam had a structural problem for a good bit of it. Orton wasn't sure at where his offense was leaning. By the time things came together it wasn't enough to make it great. Only quite good.
If you want to bring it up: the story/psychology is what made the Breaking Point match great. Can't bring up the point and ignore one match (Breaking Point) was packed to the brim with it.
Orton punting Cena's dad is what made the psychology great, It gave you the feel that Cena wanted to destroy Orton. The wrestling was good but not as great as it could of beem and finally, The atmosphere was electric with people badly wanting Orton to gain the championship and beat Cean. It got to a point where i thought the crowd was actually gonna riot when Cena retained.
I think i am being a bit bias though, Their 2009 encounters were better in wrestling sense and equal in psychology. So i could see why you prefer them over the latter.