Do you know what sloppy means though? his timing and execution is impeccable.
Of course I do. I just don't like his offense. He doesn't have an organized wrestling style and I prefer the more clean styles. I mean, what is he? A high-flyer, a technician or a brawler? Or based on his finisher, a power wrestler? You understand what I mean? There can be instances where more than one type of wrestling style is meshed to perfection like Benoit (technique, power and speed plus flawless diving maneuvers) and Lesnar (power, agility and technician) but with Punk, it's done so sloppily, it makes it a less pleasant experience than I'd like for somebody who's mixing styles together. Another thing I don't like is his execution of certain moves. The Elbow Drop and Suicide Dive for instance. He is on point when it comes to selling and executing non-complex submission moves, though.
I still give him credit when it's due. For instance, I enjoyed the Rock match whereas most have bashed the fuck out of it in this thread.
And while we're on the topic of sloppy, I consider Cena the same with an undecided moveset where he may stick to his 5 moves of doom one match and bring out a long arsenal of other moves in a bigger match. In Cena's case, he usually REALLY brings it when it's time for it, though. So it's motivation that holds him back whereas with Punk, he simply is not my cup of tea but can still be enjoyable. It's like Cal with The Rock.
Punk's name belongs in the same vein of the main event as Orton, Benoit, and Jericho. Miz is out of place though, I'd agree with that.
It's unfortunate you've allowed your hate of Punk to get to such high levels it's causing you to not enjoy Rock either. I mean even Rock316AE is simply no-selling Punk in the feud, and hell, he's been no-selling Punk for months to the point I forget at times he hates Punk, and even question if he really does. I can't tell you to enjoy Punk/Rock if you don't, and you have every right to post to your heart's content how much Punk sucks to you, but let me ask, what are you accomplishing by doing so at this point? Everyone knows you hate Punk, it's no secret anymore. You don't enjoy him, so why post about him? I know you're better than trolls like Hawksea, or is that what this is? A constant troll effort? I'm all for good trolling as much of the next guy, but when it's on the same subject seemingly every single day of every week, it gets tiring.
But like I said, you're of course free to hate Punk all you want, but once again, what are you trying to accomplish by doing so?
Punk's name in the same vein as Benoit... lol. But that's not the discussion here so I'll skip that.
For the rest of your post, I'm not trying to accomplish anything, really. It's just that Punk is such a focal point that it's hard to avoid talking about him or becoming a broken record. I mean, I don't like Zack Ryder but he's so irrelevant that I wont be surprised if most don't even realize that one thing about me. I will try to avoid talking about him in the future, though. Don't know what keeps me going but I just might start no-selling him. That sounds like a great idea and I'll try not to fall into the trap. Thankfully, I've started avoiding Punk topics a bit more frequently as I used to even lurk threads about his interviews and shit.