He's wrestled two matches since the beginning of 2011.
You're not including the time others waste talking to/about him. (Such a thing is like they do for guys like Rock, when they aren't on the regular roster.)
Point to promos and video packages, but do you REALLY think that's a Taker thing and not a Vince/WWE in general thing?
What rules-out the possibility that it's both?! The two ware not mutually-exclusive.
Pretty sure that time came a long time ago and he hasn't been hogging any time up or stealing any spotlights.
His entrances alone seem to take forever, & that's only counting the time before he even hits the stage. Then, the hour-long crawl to the ring, etc... And each move takes longer (probably due in large part to his advanced age, etc.).
Taker having an ego just sounds like bullshit.
As the Ziggler shirt says, "Not bragging if you back it up." There was a time I enjoyed watching the man/his matches. But I wonder how much what he did has earned of what he's gotten since then, & how much Vince/WWE have just given him? (Perhaps a mix, believing your own hype, doing what they let you get away with, or something?)
WWE themselves seem to simply refuse to put anyone against Taker who isn't already an established "legend" in their eyes. That's not Taker's doing.
For several WMs now, I've seen what I feel is a circular discussion going on: Some feel Taker's streak should end to an established guy (those are the people backing HHH & HBK matches), whereas some say ending the streak should be a rub for a young/future star.
Basically all I got from that post is "I don't like him because WWE don't push young people." I can't get you to like him, but it sounds more like visceral disliking. Which isn't bad or anything, everyone has bias whether they think so or not. I'm not 100% sure why I despise Paul London myself.
It's certainly not that; I see WWE often pushing young people (albeit largely later-generation stars like Orton, Cody, DiBiase, etc.)... But I like/dislike (some of) those & many on the roster for much different reasons.
I'm not sure why you despise Paul London, either... Can't help you, since I don't.