I'm sorry but there is no way that the Wyatt's three way for the WWE Title is main eventing Wresltemaina 33. I know that Orton won the rumble and he should be in the main event, But remember what happened with Sheamus when he won the rumble and got the opening match for the World Heavyweight title at WM 28? I think that is going to happen to the Wyatts at Mania this year.
I mean, maybe it will not be the opener to WM 33 but I do not see it main eventing Wresltemaina this year. Im pretty sure that the Main event of this year's WM will be Goldberg vs Brock Lesner for the Universal title because WWE like to do that to people...
But if that is not the case, then good for Bray and Luke to be in their first massive PPV main event...
But but but how can you enjoy it, if they don't get the proper respect of the only thing that matters, the main event. Punk said if it's not last it doesn't matter, how can you care about a match that goes early??????
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
Yeah, it definitely isnt.
Goldberg vs Lesnar and Reigns vs Undertaker for sure will be booked as more important than it. Then maybe Rollins vs HHH and Shane vs Styles depending on how important they make the matches. Anti Authority feuds are usually booked as really important.
Orton vs Wyatt was already kind of weak since they didnt even really get much of a reaction or put on much of a match at No Mercy, but adding Harper, as much as I like him, just cheapens it further since he hasnt been built up anywhere near as much as he needed to have been to be in this spot.
Goldberg vs Lesnar and Reigns vs Undertaker for sure will be booked as more important than it. Then maybe Rollins vs HHH and Shane vs Styles depending on how important they make the matches. Anti Authority feuds are usually booked as really important.
Orton vs Wyatt was already kind of weak since they didnt even really get much of a reaction or put on much of a match at No Mercy, but adding Harper, as much as I like him, just cheapens it further since he hasnt been built up anywhere near as much as he needed to have been to be in this spot.
I'm sorry but there's no way that Styles vs Shane is going on after the WWE title match. . Nor will Seth vs HHH. What is the point of Orton winning the RR to "main event Wrestlemania" if the match goes on fourth or fifth last? Fair enough on the Undertaker match because that's probably his last match and one of the title matches has to go on last, but any other non-title match going on after would be dumb.
You really think that a Smackdown title is going to main event wrestlemania? I know that the WWE title is a better title than the universal title, but this is Goldberg Vs Lesner we are talking and this is the true mania event of WM 33 this year.
As much as I hate to see that match AGAIN....It is the money main event match going into Wrestlemania this year for the universal title...
That true too but still...A main event is something that is suppose to end the show..meaning the LAST MATCH ON THE CARD!!! Like at Hell in a Cell with that stupid "Triple main event" crap...
And if that is the case with WM...Which I really hope it is not...Then I will still watch it but will be a little annoyed.
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
Why is everyone taking the comment about Wyatt main eventing so literal?
They literally say the same thing each year about most title matches (especially WWE and WHC championship as it's been in previous years).
The commentators used to say XX is competing in the main event at WM against The Undertaker.
They are simple trying to make it feel like we are being spoiled for choice with so many main event type matches, it doesn't personally work on me but that's the aim.
Punk actually covered this in his controversial post-WWE interview. He said something along the lines of wanting to be in the main event of Wrestlemania and Triple H or Vince going "but you were in the main event with The Undertaker!" and he was all "don't play dumb with me, the main event is the last match on the show". Massively paraphrased but it went something like that.
It's really just a marketing buzzword nowadays when they say a match is a "Main Event".
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
I don't think anyone is really expecting it to main event the show tbh, it's a shame that the WWE title match will most likely be treated as the 3rd or 4th most important match at Wrestlemania.
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
Whether a match will go last @ 'Mania depends on:
A). Title or not?
B). Special attraction (e.g. LT Taylor)?
C). Face / Heel dynamics?
D). Projected fan reaction?
E). Box-office role?
F). Single match > triple threat (or fatal fourway)
The Wyatt triple threat simply has the belt; nothing else:
1). It's not a big-time box-office attraction, as none of the 3 are major draws (Orton peaked years ago).
2). Too much heeling. All 3 were heels until recently.
3). No special attraction
4). Single matches tend to get preference over triple threat / fatal fourway. See Mysterio in 2006.
It has to be Brock vs Goldberg or Roman vs Undertaker.
The only reason I give Reigns vs Taker a chance is that Brock, a heel, will win; but Brock will probably get cheered anyways. They may also have some special standing ovation for Goldberg once he loses, which is a fitting way to close the show.
No shit. Thankfully there's better stuff worthy of main eventing WM. I like Bray/Harper/Orton fine but they're not worthy of main eventing the biggest fake sports entertainment show of the year.
No shit. Thankfully there's better stuff worthy of main eventing WM. I like Bray/Harper/Orton fine but they're not worthy of main eventing the biggest fake sports entertainment show of the year.
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
The match everyone wants to see should be on last.
& surely the title matches should be built up in such a way that it'd naturally be the ones people would want to watch? but that's deffo not the case in a lot of cases.
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
I learned a long time ago not to give a shit where a match sits on the Mania card. The last time I got pissed over that was 10 years ago at Mania 23, when Batista/Taker for the World Title went on 4th out of an 8-match card; literally going on at the halfway point.
To even make it on the card itself is a big deal, and to get a singles match is even bigger. And it all means a fat payday in the end.
I know some fans put a lot of stock into what match should close the show, or what order the card should go in, but WWE's formula for a long time has been to offer multiple main events, so sometimes it's a gamble as to which one will actually close Mania.
I don't lose any sleep over it. If some other fans or wrestlers do, I suppose that's their problem.
I learned a long time ago not to give a shit where a match sits on the Mania card. The last time I got pissed over that was 10 years ago at Mania 23, when Batista/Taker for the World Title went on 4th out of an 8-match card; literally going on at the halfway point.
Remember when Edge defended his World Heavyweight Championship against Alberto del Rio...in the opening match to WrestleMania 27? Yeah, it's best not to worry about placement.
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
Goes without saying. I like Bray but this match isn't big enough to main event. It wasn't even a worthy main event at No Mercy. Shoehorning the title into it won't change that, especially with the inclusion of Harper who is going from jobbing to Kane clean to competing for the WWE Championship at Wrestlemania. There's simply no chance it's presented bigger than Goldberg/Lesnar or Undertaker/Reigns nor should it be. They'll get the Ambrose/Dolph treatment and be stuck in the middle or tail end of the card in a "triple main event."
Re: There is no way that the Wyatts are main eventing Wrestlemaina
But Roman and triple H can main event last year ?
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Wrestling Forum
23.4M posts
266.5K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.