Wrestling Forum banner

WFs Favourite Female Results.

8K views 107 replies 44 participants last post by  JustAName 
#1 · (Edited)
Thanks to those who voted and all votes have been counted. If you voted less than the 10, your votes were adjusted accordingly.


1. Becky Lynch
Brand: Smackdown
Debut: 2013
Points: 370.


2. Alexa Bliss
Brand: Smackdown (current champ)
Debut: 2013
Points: 326


3. Charlotte Flair
Brand: Raw
Debut: 2012
Points: 318


4. Sasha Banks
Brand: Raw (current Champion)
Debut: 2012
Points: 245


5. Bayley
Brand: Raw
Debut: 2012
Points: 213



6. Asuka
Brand: NXT (current Champion)
Debut: 2015
Points: 210


7. Nikki Bella
Brand: Smackdown
Debut: 2007
Points: 168


8. Emma
Brand: Raw
Debut: 2011
Points: 117


9. Maryse
Brand: Smackdown
Debut: 2006
Points: 109


10. Carmella
Brand: Smackdown
Debut: 2013
Points: 108

The rest:


11. Lana - 60pts.


12. Peyton Royce - 59pts.


13. Eva Marie - 48pts.


14. Billie Kay - 45 pts.


(-). Renee Young - 45 pts.


16. Mandy Rose - 44pts.


17. Ember Moon - 41pts.


18. Nia Jax - 38pts.


19. Liv Morgan - 35pts.


20. Stephanie McMahon -32pts.


21. Dana Brooke - 29pts.


22. Nikki Cross - 26 pts.


23. Paige - 25pts.


24. Naomi - 24pts.


(-). Summer Rae - 24pts.


26. Alicia Fox - 15pts.


27. Natalya - 13pts.


(-). Sarah Bridges - 13pts.


29. Brie Bella - 10pts.


30. Daria - 9pts.


31. Aliyah - 5pts.


32. JoJo - 1pt.


(-). Rosa Mendes - 1pt.

And in last place with not a single vote.


34. Tamina
 
See less See more
34
#35 ·
Becky Lynch, Alexa Bliss, and Charlotte Flair finishing top 3 though :mark:
 
#40 ·
Becky's title reign may be over but her support never dies. :proud

Top 6 is excellent though.
 
#45 ·
I hate to see the valid argument of differing levels of opportunity reduced to nothing more than being an excuse. It's not. While it's ridiculous to think that everyone will be given equal amounts of opportunity in this business, it's equally as ridiculous to dismiss that fact. Charlotte is obviously my favorite and you'll never hear me try to act like she hasn't been given the most chances and screentime at bettering her character and mic work. It's a fact. I will always applaud her for making the most out of her opportunities, but will never dismiss the argument that maybe others could shine too if given the same chances. Sasha is the only one in the ballpark here and she has flopped as far as quality goes on the mic, IMO. Alexa is getting some quality time and is showing much promise. Becky has also shown much improvement. When it comes to big match opportunities Sasha has been given the most opportunities by a decent margin with Charlotte being second. If Mickie return to the main roster than obviously she will be right up there to. Becky amd Bayley a long distance away when one honestly compares opportunity and no one else is even close. Asuka doesnt even factor in for me as she's just on a different level.
 
#58 ·
I wish more marks of their favorites were like you.

Well now you've brought up a thousand factors each which can be used as an excuse for why her matches aren't great; if it's not the time it's the talent level, if it's not the talent level it's the match build, if it's not the build it's the booking. Becky is on SDL, none of those girls are on her level but if she's as great as you say she is, she'll still be able to turn out great matches.

It's not as though none of those things are valid factors that affect match quality, it's that she can still be considered the hands down best without ever overcoming them. How do you get to stay the best wrestler with a practically non existent catalog of great matches? Sasha is considered an awful wrestler despite a deep catalog of great matches, how does that work? Why doesn't anybody else get that same kind of leeway? Somebody mentioned Bayley and Dana but Bayley didn't get a pass because the match only got 7 minutes and the build was awful and Dana's one of the greenest.

What if Becky never gets the 15 minute 1 on 1 match with a near equal level opponent with the clean finish? Does she get to stay the best forever? Better yet, what if she does and the match still isn't great, does she still get to be the best because she can chain wrestle with the best of them?
I've already explained this so many times. now, Care to reply to this post I said yesterday?

If that's your only leg to stand on then there's no point arguing anymore.

Can you at least admit, that Sasha's had more opportunities than any other besides maybe Bayley, to have these great matches?

Oh, It's such a shocking development that Bayley vs Becky's no built sub 10min matches in an NXT taping didn't tear the house down, or Charlotte's matches with Becky where the only 10+min match was the Rumble, which involved like 3 Ric Flair appearances and interference and Jacket finisher, something Sasha's matches had the luxury of not having.

Let's also ignore that they bombed on SummerSlam HIAC and NOC ( which had Bayley instead of Becky and the same amount of time).

Let's also ignore Charlotte vs Natalya which was the first real great women's match in WWE. The only other 1 on 1 match for Charlotte over 15min which didn't include Sasha, which is arguably as good as any of the Sasha/Charlotte matches on RAW.

How about you admit to the facts everytime there was 15+min women's match between the horsewomen or a high-experianced wrestler like Natalya, they produced magic.

Bayley's the weakest link in general, but Charlotte and Becky can for sure produce the same quality of matches Sasha's had if they were given what Sasha was given.

You are completely blinded by YOUR BIAS, and refusing to acknowledge all the factors that helped Sasha such as TIME ( double the amount of time of Bayley/Charlotte, 1.5x time of Becky/Charlotte AND no shenanigans taking away from it), and a gimmick matches that HELPS the performers like FCA, and not hinders them like a tables match.

When was Charlotte and Becky ever given a clean 1 on 1 15min+ match? when was Charlotte vs Bayley given that? when was Becky vs Bayley given that? The answer is NEVER. ON THE OTHER HAND, Sasha vs Becky WAS GIVEN 15+min. Bayley vs Sasha WAS given 15+ min. Charlotte vs Sasha was given 20min.

Are any of these matches worth a mention?









Then why should Bayley/Becky be?
Not even gona bother with many Sasha/Charlotte matches because there's evidence of two highly built matches that fell flat. These matches weren't performed on the special platform which is Takeover Event or RAW MAIN EVENT.
Also, You know Bayley's been given a pass, who the hell ever criticizes Bayley?
I am a fan of her matches with Asuka even though they weren't ****+ they were all good matches, but when you have Asuka presented as much better and more dominant the match will not be as evenly match as it was Sasha/Bayley.

You wana know why Charlotte and Becky are considered better than Sasha?
Simple. They can chain wrestle better. they're stronger. they're more crisp and solid. Becky is a better seller. They can both go to the top rop and execute different moves, and both are willing to dive to the outside when needed. Sasha is sloppier, she's athletic and has a great move-set, but she's not the complete wrestler Charlotte and Becky are, and you know it.


I thought I've seen every ridiculous excuse possible this week, but now Becky needs to WIN CLEAN to put out a 4 star match that doesn't involve Sasha :lol. @Chris JeriG.O.A.T Sasha is officially a goddess for putting on the greatest women's match of all time and another classic with Bayley in defeat. There goes the bullshit speculation that she throws matches she loses too.
You know that's BS when she gave Sasha one of her best 3 matches in defeat. Stop putting words in others mouth to make your arguments better. The finish of the match is part of the match and it can take away from it or add to it, and you know it. You use Meltzer to back up your claims of great Sasha is and even he rated both the Charlotte/Sasha PPV matches BELOW the Becky/Charlotte PPV at the rumble which had LESS TIME, AND MORE BS interference form Ric Flair.
 
#74 ·
Becky has had chances. She was handed the reins of Smackdown. she's pretty much numero uno of her own brand, with or without the belt. She's always going to be in contention with Alexa, Carmella and Nikki. Naomi & Natalya are both lost causes to me and lord knows where Eva goes from here.

She might not be handed 20 minute matches every week and PPV, but I'm entertained with what she's given. It's not about how long somebody is given, but what they do with it. Hell a 5 minute match can be just as fun as a 15 minute one. I'm not quite sure how they can give her more right now, than what they already are. Can booking be better? Sure, but that's WWE in general not just the ladies divisions.
 
#49 ·
Next year's poll will be very interesting in my opinion. After the NXT ladies have another year under their caps, and Raw and SDL are still dominated by the same people. I feel the Top 10 will be quite different.

I don't expect Paige to be eligible next year (she'll be long gone by next December IMO) and whoever else gets the chop.

I quite like the fact there were 34 women to choose from. The women regardless of how you feel for them have come a long way.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top