Wrestling Forum banner

So who would you like more

Would you rather Cena or Reigns for 5 years

3K views 51 replies 46 participants last post by  VIPER 
#1 ·
Just a random poll do you sheeple want the current reigns we got or the cena who was having a classic match every week in 2015 as the center of attention for the next 5 years?
 
#13 ·
In some of his early matches, I was thinking, "Blergh! Just another big man who can't do anything but hit and no sell a hit." Now, I'm super impressed by how consistent his ring work is. He's definitely improved on that.

Am I the only one who remembers how Pres. GW Bush had so much trouble with other people's words that it was internationally embarrassing? When he spoke extemporaneously he wasn't half-bad. They've GOT to quit trying to get RoRe to memorize a script.
 
#9 ·
OP you do realise that Cena's most likely going to be gone by the end of the year right? Come 2017 he'll most likely be a part timer at best while Reigns is still going to be in the WWE for another 5 years or so at least.
WWE without Cena is like call of duty without soap and Vince knows this.
I personally would love Cena more IF he was putting great matches and had good feuds.
They should make him the wwe champion it would boost ratings too.

Ok So far None is the most voted im off to sleep have fun
 
#8 · (Edited)
The funny thing I was asking myself this.

Cause Roman is way less believable Superman. So if your gonna book him like Cena, I just don't know. Swagger is the only one I see as a patriotic babyface that could do what Cena does, but better cause he has great wrestling ability.

In my head, I keep thinking "why can't we have both". Like instead of just doing fast torch passing, take the old Orton/Cena feud, and transplant that setup into Roman/Cena.

Except Rollins fits better, cause he has ties to HHH, so it fits the formula better as far as the heel/face thing.
 
#12 · (Edited)
Neither, I don't believe there should be a sole focus of the company.

Cena has done virtually everything he really needs to do anyway. Save put over more of the next gen talent. Which I don't see happening with Vince in charge. I mean, if a fifty year old Undertaker is not putting them over yet, what is the chance a dozen years younger Cena is going to soon? I still have hope for Reigns and wish him to stay around. But not as "the" star.
 
#19 ·
Not sure why there's a third option. I voted for Cena. He can at least pretend to be intense and actually interested in what he's doing. Roman seemingly has no passion when he wrestles or talks.
 
#20 ·
That is like asking me would I rather get slit in throat or get shoot in the head both are not ideal for me.
 
#35 ·
I rather get shot in the head, your death is instantaneous. Getting your throat slit wouldn't kill you instantaneously, it will kill you fast but not on the spot, so you will be feeling crazy pain for a few seconds and I rather not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shenroe
#27 ·
I'd say Cena. His matches are great usually and he cuts a good promo with good material. I think that with him, I'm just not that interested because of his booking as he's pretty much not changed at all since 2006. Reigns I just find hard to be interesting. He's put on some really good matches, but as a performer there's just not a lot that I find interesting about him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: New Day
#36 ·
I would go back to 2005 and i would have chosed Reigns over Cena to be the new top face without a fucking doubt.

Reigns has a an inherited talent and great potential the would explode some day.
Cena is one of the worst professional wrestlers i've ever seen.
Why won't you do it now :ti?
 
  • Like
Reactions: New Day
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top