Wrestling Forum banner

Scrap taker/cena and do taker/Orton instead

1K views 17 replies 13 participants last post by  WakeUpMuricah 
#1 ·
Let's all be honest here. Who here in this day still wants an undertaker vs John Cena as much as before? Cena and taker are both up there in age now and this kind of match shouldve been done a few years ago when both were still in their primes. There's nothing interesting about it anymore since takers streak is now gone and Cena is about to be a part timer soon. I'm betting that this match for wrestlemania 32 is either isn't gonna draw well or its gonna be boring before it even happens. Now, I'm better off with an undertaker vs. Randy Orton instead only because Randy Orton is still young (younger than Cena) and he has a few more years left when he comes back from his neck and shoulder injuries. Ever since Orton reached main event, we clearly never had a chance to see him feud with taker again since his legend killer days. Given that Orton can still go at it and isn't at the point where he needs to be a part timer like Cena will soon, I think an Orton/taker should be more interesting than Cena/taker. Who here agrees?
 
#11 ·
I'd rather see Taker/Reigns or even Cena/Reigns. If they are going to insist on pushing him they may as well go all the way. That's half of the problem with getting anyone over anymore. The likes of HHH, Cena, Taker, and even Lesnar never eat a clean decisive loss or put anyone over. All Reigns has done is go over all the same geeks who can't get a big win to save their lives. Beating Ambrose to win the tournament means little when we've seen time and time again that Ambrose can't get the big win when it counts. The HIAC match with Wyatt was solid but again, Wyatt can't get a win over Taker even with 3 giants on his side. A Taker match with Cena will only end in the same non-finishes we got with Lesnar. No thanks.
 
#12 ·
I honestly think this would be a better idea then Taker/Cena, as Orton is a baby face but still has an aspect in him where he wants to destroy his opponent. If Taker faces Cena, it just means months of really tacky promo's where Cena says "I respect you, but at Wrestlemania I'm going to give it my best!" or some corny shit. The only problem is Orton really doesn't have the juice right now for a Taker match, as he's lost most of his big feuds it seems in the last few years. But if they did face, I do think Orton should get the win.
 
#15 ·
I honestly think this would be a better idea then Taker/Cena, as Orton is a baby face but still has an aspect in him where he wants to destroy his opponent. If Taker faces Cena, it just means months of really tacky promo's where Cena says "I respect you, but at Wrestlemania I'm going to give it my best!" or some corny shit. The only problem is Orton really doesn't have the juice right now for a Taker match, as he's lost most of his big feuds it seems in the last few years. But if they did face, I do think Orton should get the win.
Orton, a guy who's clearly bored and already accomplished everything there is to accomplish in WWE, should get the honor of being only the second person in history to defeat the Undertaker at Wrestlemania?
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top