I don't see why a Royal Rumble win has to absolutely define whether or not someone had a successful WWE run or not. Look at Savage, Warrior, Diesel, Foley, Jericho...
Meanwhile guys like Sheamus, Del Rio, Yokozuna have won it, so who cares.
Even if he hadn't won in 07, The Undertaker is not the kind of wrestler that needs things like Royal Rumble wins and double digit title reigns to convince you he is great. His longevity, consistency and ability speak for themselves .
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Wrestling Forum
23.4M posts
266.5K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.