Wrestling Forum banner

Is Bryan Alvarez a Bryan Mark?

4K views 49 replies 29 participants last post by  Nickolas 
#1 ·
Was listening to his rant on Reigns, and he's echoing the thoughts of the DB fans here. I mean he's speaking for you guys! If you're a DBfan/RomanHater you should give it a listen.

But I have a question, is he known for strongly supporting Bryan? I don't really listen to him that much besides his "After Dark" shows. He seemed very emotional and unreasonable in his rant imho. The way he crapped on everything makes me wonder if he has an agenda. I'm not saying that everyone who dislikes Reigns is a DB mark, but I'm curious about this guy.
 
#3 ·
He likes Bryan and considers him a great performer. That's about it. Do you have to be a "mark" to enjoy a great performer?

He's very passionate about wrestling as he's an ex-wrestler himself (more so than Meltzer who loves wrestling but can be more detached as he's seen it all with WWE already, he knows how they think and that it's not changing), hence why he gets emotional about certain things in wrestling, especially stupid match finishes.

The idea of "Bryan should be pushed as the top guy for now" is not exclusive to "Bryan marks". It's very obvious to anyone watching the TV, that Reigns is the wrong choice, and that it's going to bite WWE in the ass no matter what they do.
 
#27 ·
Why is everyone responding to the OP?
Alvarez didn't attack Reigns, he ranted about him being booked stupidly, the OP isn't even mentally able to differentiate that.

Plus, I'm sick and tired of trolls calling everyone who doesn't like Reigns "Bryan marks". What the fuck is wrong with you?
 
#31 ·
Most people have said Reigns is stupidly booked, isn't ready yet and a lot of them don't even hate Reigns. Sadly most Reigns marks don't care, they don't read anything, just bash anyone who disagrees with Reigns push regardless or reason. Can't tell if people like the OP are trolls or what, swear seen OP trying to goad people before Reign's push.
 
#36 ·
Well, the more extreme Reigns marks adhere to the old tried and true rule of "If you dont like the message, attack the messenger." Here's a novel concept, be confident enough in your own beliefs that you arent threatened when some one holds an opinion contrary to yours. I'm sure there are people questioning Meltzer's objectivity because he had the temerity to correctly point out that Reigns is not nearly as over as past Mania headliners. You Reigns fans should be happy your guy is in the main event and worry less about others not liking him. If I were you, I'd hope WWE improves his booking as far as likeability because they are failing him big time in that department.
 
#37 · (Edited)
Well, the more extreme Reigns marks adhere to the old tried and true rule of "If you dont like the message, attack the messenger." Here's a novel concept, be confident enough in your own beliefs that you arent threatened when some one holds an opinion contrary to yours. I'm sure there are people questioning Meltzer's objectivity because he had the temerity to correctly point out that Reigns is not nearly as over as past Mania headliners. You Reigns fans should be happy your guy is in the main event and worry less about others not liking him. If I were you, I'd hope WWE improves his booking as far as likeability because they are failing him big time in that department.
What? :swaggerwhat

Lets get some things straight here

I've been an unapologetic supporter of Reigns, I'm not threatened by opinions. Do you see the guys calling me worthless and a shit fan because I like Reigns???? They are the ones threatened by opinions. I asked a question because he truly came off that way in his last rant. If you don't think so thats your opinion!

Not everyone loves Bryan and not everyone shares your opinion of him. Difference between me and Bryan marks is that I don't call everyone dumb, worthless, or less of a fan because they don't like my guy.
 
#9 ·
He's just a mark for a booking style that makes sense, which includes pushing the guys that have fully developed talent and are "over". Same can be said for Keller, Meltzer, etc. These wrestling journalists/commentators to a man think it's a huge mistake for Reigns to be in this spot, and also think if you are going to gamble and put him there at least give him the best chance to succeed.
 
#30 ·
He's a Bryan mark because they are both from Washington state.

On a serious note, he's a fan of DB but I wouldn't call him a "mark".

He's come to terms with Reigns headlining WM. The issue he had, and the source for the rant, is that the guy was undefeated in singles matches coming out of the RR and lost to both Big Show and Rollins on his way to challenging the unstoppable champion.


Meltzer rationalized it from their perspective by saying WWE likely did it to set up future challengers for Reigns post WM, but Bryan disagreed with having the guy lose twice when he was previously undefeated heading into WM.


The guy has a point. Lesnar 2014-2015 is unstoppable. Reigns was undefeated. Why have him lose twice en route to the biggest match of his life vs an unstoppable champ? Makes no sense.
 
#21 ·
Yeah, from what I've heard he loves Bryan.. why shouldn't he? He's the best all-rounder in the company at the moment.
He's completely delusional here though.. WWE need to create a new big star, they decided on Reigns. Why use the rub of a victory over Brock on a guy just back from serious neck and nerve issues? And a guy who doesn't need that rub to become a star.
Ridiculous they don't have a big match for him though. Insulting to fans and the man himself.
 
#34 ·
Oh what an amazing "not stupid at all" thread...

OP continue the good work brother..
 
#40 ·
this motherfucker who made a career out of his fucking useless rants.. always targets who internet hates, gets a rant on them and gets a praise in internet for sticking up to the evil wrestling organization who don't push his favorites.

meltzer is better than this asshole, although he's no better when it comes to blind support for Bryan
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top