Re: who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after Vin
A Triple H, Zeb Colter and Paul Heyman team doing creative.
Stephanie McMahon the fuck away from creative but handling the business. Maybe get Shane back in there too.
Sorted.
A Triple H, Zeb Colter and Paul Heyman team doing creative.
Stephanie McMahon the fuck away from creative but handling the business. Maybe get Shane back in there too.
Sorted.
Re: who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after Vin
It should be Triple H, but that's probably a huge mistake. I have no faith in Triple H running WWE successfully, especially when he doesn't have Vince there to help him out... All the opions are pretty bad. I think WWE is fucked once Vince goes.
Re: who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after Vin
I think a joint leadship of Heyman and HHH (I was weary of him taking control at first, but NXT is fantastic) would be pretty damn great, although I know it would never happen.
Re: who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after Vin
Probably the most unrealistic option but I chose heyman. Dude is a creative genius I loved what he did in the real ecw. Not the best when it came to business affairs but with the WWE 's cash cow he'd have no worries.
Re: who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after Vin
VINCE FUCKING RUSSO i mean this is the guy that booked wcw and wwf at their peak while true pool matches are bad but at the bright side he makes people like rollins ziggler and even cesaro main eventers so i would still give him a chance
Shane. He's the one of the few people who said VINCE should try to be a little like ECW before the AE and wanted the WWE to be similar like UFC before they got popular. But VINCE always shut down Shane's idea that why he left. Have no trust on HHH and Stephanie like seriously? Paul would be good!
who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after...
Too many people act like they understand the particulars of the wrestling business, even though very few people on this forum have ever worked for a wrestling company. It's difficult to determine who should run a company when you don't even know the fine details of what they do.
However, some things leak, and it's understandable how fans could be upset at the leadership's decision making. I read once that it was actually Triple H who preferred Roman Reigns to main event Wrestlemania. Still, I don't think enough details are available to the point where the fans can make a decision about who should run the company.
Re: who do you want making the decisions in WWE. who should be the head guy after Vin
Don't really care as long as they're good. Right now I wouldn't exactly trust anyone on that list.
Who ran Smackdown between2002 and 2008? That/those persona(s).
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Wrestling Forum
23.4M posts
266.5K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.