Wrestling Forum banner

Wouldn't it make more sense if....

750 views 10 replies 9 participants last post by  Mister Abigail 
#1 ·
Rumor has it that Reigns is to win the Rumble and fight Brock for the title at WM31. However, some have said that some in WWE want the Rock to fight Brock for the title instead. Others say that Rock is slated to have a match with Rusev at WM31.

Instead of doing Reigns vs. Lesnar and Rock vs. Rusev, wouldn't it be far better off to do Reigns vs. Rusev and Brock vs. Rock? That way, you have the marquee matchup that people will pay to see, and Reigns will still get built as a top star if he is the first to hand Rusev a loss. It allows WWE to get a huge buy-rate for WM (instead of Rock vs. Rusev, who wants to see that shit), as well as position Reigns for the future.

What do you guys think?
 
#4 ·
ffs it's very unlikely Reigns is facing Lesnar at WrestleMania, that bogus rumor always sounded like bullshit. WWE can do better than like... Like the matches you just mentioned, that sounds pretty good. If The Rock is willing to work WrestleMania.. but Rock vs. Brock shouldn't be for the title though, that match should happen the following year if Brock is still with the company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bipartisan101
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top