Wrestling Forum banner

Brock Lesnar CONQUERED THE STREAK. Was This The Right Call?

THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

474K views 3K replies 1K participants last post by  Rick Sanchez 
#1 · (Edited)











THE STREAK vs. THE BEAST

Since returning to WWE nearly two years ago, Brock Lesnar has basked in his wanton destruction, whether it was breaking the arms of WWE Legends, decimating Big Show with chairs or bringing Triple H to the brink of retirement.

At WrestleMania 30, however, the self-proclaimed No. 1 contender to the WWE World Heavyweight Champion will stare down perhaps his gravest challenge yet: The Undertaker.

The Deadman confronted The Beast Incarnate on the Feb. 24 edition of Raw. The Undertaker’s unannounced appearance came after Lesnar and his advocate, Paul Heyman — given the opportunity by The Authority to name Lesnar’s WrestleMania opponent — claimed no man alive deserves to compete against the former Undisputed WWE Champion.

To Lesnar and Heyman’s surprise, it wasn’t a mere man who answered the call but, rather, WWE’s one and only Deadman. After standing toe-to-toe with The Phenom, Lesnar made no hesitation to sign the open contract before shoving a pen into Undertaker's chest. The Deadman took umbrage at The Beast's gesture, slamming the pen down into Lesnar's hand before chokeslamming him through a table in the middle of the ring. As The Undertaker gazed at the WrestleMania 30 sign that looms over the squared circle, the WWE Universe buzzed as the battle between the two juggernauts became official.

As the keeper of WWE’s most extraordinary record going today, a flawless 21-0 WrestleMania Streak, The Undertaker has proven to be all but unbeatable at The Grandest Stage of Them All. Will the same be true when he faces the Heyman-coached Anomaly?

Even though it has been more than a decade since their last battle, The Undertaker and Lesnar are familiar foes, having famously warred during The Beast Incarnate’s first run in WWE.

Now, the rematch that long seemed hypothetical will become a reality at The Showcase of The Immortals. Heyman insists his charge is the rightful top contender to WWE World Heavyweight Champion Randy Orton, and a victory over The Undertaker at WrestleMania, of all places, might be all the proof The Authority needs to agree. Yet, the opportunity for greatness is pocked with severe risk: Twenty-one times, The Undertaker has turned back challenges from WWE’s top Superstars, from Triple H to Randy Orton to Shawn Michaels, at WrestleMania. Might the newest addition to the list be a Beast that has bested him before?

To watch how the high-stakes matchup plays out, be sure to watch WrestleMania 30 when it airs on Sunday, April 6, from New Orleans’ Mercedes-Benz Superdome, live on WWE Network.​
Link - http://www.wwe.com/shows/wrestlemania/30/undertaker-brock-lesnar-26184576

only thing worth a damn
 
See less See more
2 3
#607 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar - THERE'S A WAR COMING THIS WAY

Bah Gawd.

"21-1"

"Streak Dies!"

"Streak's Over! Streak's Over!"


What a great promo. Gotta love dat Paul Heyman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robertdeniro
#1,840 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

The Undertaker had never lost at Wrestlemania when Sir Alex Ferguson was in charge. In comes David Moyes and The Undertaker loses...
:lmao :lmao :lmao

Repped.
 
#109 ·
Re: Brock Vs. Undertaker: Ugh ....

You guys will complain about anything.
There is nothing appealing about Brock/Taker. Brock isn't a believable threat like Sting or Cena would be and he isn't a young guy getting a rub by facing Taker like Reigns or Wyatt would be. Anyways, Brock shouldn't be losing anymore if it's gonna mean anything when he puts over a young guy before he leaves.
 
#1,344 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

How the fuck was this the right decision?

WWE JUST LOST THEIR BIGGEST DRAW AT MANIA AND GAVE THE STREAK TO A PART TIME GUY WHO WON'T BE AROUND IN TWO OR THREE YEARS. INSTEAD OF GIVING THE STREAK TO AN UP AND COMING STAR WITH POTENTIAL TO BE THE FUTURE OF THE COMPANY. HOW CAN YOU NOT FUCKING COMPREHEND THIS. IF TAKER FELT HE NEEDED TO STOP, THEN HE SHOULD HAVE READ A FUCKING BUSINESS BOOK FIRST TO GET SOME SENSE IN HIS DEAD ASS BRAIN BEFORE MAKING A SHIT DECISION. THEN HE SHOULD OF HAD THIS SHIT MATCH AT 30, WENT AWAY FOR A YEAR, EAT SOME SPINACH, GIVE MICHELLE SOME DEADMAN DICK, AND DROP THE STREAK AT MANIA 31 TO SOMEONE WHO WILL BE AROUND FOR THE NEXT GENERATION. AM I RIGHT? YES I'M RIGHT. THANK YOU HEADLINER. YOU'RE A GENTLEMAN AND A SCHOLAR.
 
#1,359 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

How the fuck was this the right decision?

WWE JUST LOST THEIR BIGGEST DRAW AT MANIA AND GAVE THE STREAK TO A PART TIME GUY WHO WON'T BE AROUND IN TWO OR THREE YEARS. INSTEAD OF GIVING THE STREAK TO AN UP AND COMING STAR WITH POTENTIAL TO BE THE FUTURE OF THE COMPANY. HOW CAN YOU NOT FUCKING COMPREHEND THIS. IF TAKER FELT HE NEEDED TO STOP, THEN HE SHOULD HAVE READ A FUCKING BUSINESS BOOK FIRST TO GET SOME SENSE IN HIS DEAD ASS BRAIN BEFORE MAKING A SHIT DECISION. THEN HE SHOULD OF HAD THIS SHIT MATCH AT 30, WENT AWAY FOR A YEAR, EAT SOME SPINACH, GIVE MICHELLE SOME DEADMAN DICK, AND DROP THE STREAK AT MANIA 31 TO SOMEONE WHO WILL BE AROUND FOR THE NEXT GENERATION. AM I RIGHT? YES I'M RIGHT. THANK YOU HEADLINER. YOU'RE A GENTLEMAN AND A SCHOLAR.
LOL
 
#1,803 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I've lost a bit of faith seeing how many people voted yes. After that horrible build up and match, after 20+ years it was a good idea to end the Streak in such a casual way? The ending sequence wasn't even good! I have not heard one good reason why the Streak should have broke in the half-assed way it did aside from because it was "shocking". Well you know what, it was shocking in the same way the Fingerpoke of Doom was shocking and that too was absolute bullshit booking. Actually think this is worse.

You have something built up for years that most fans are very invested in, something bigger than the title, and you throw it away halfway through the card without any real buildup. Nevermind Lesnar being a part-timer who never really needed this win. This should've been a HUGE moment, with much, much better build up and focus, and something that main evented. And not to mention it completely overshadowed Bryans' win.
 
#1,828 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I've lost a bit of faith seeing how many people voted yes. After that horrible build up and match, after 20+ years it was a good idea to end the Streak in such a casual way? The ending sequence wasn't even good! I have not heard one good reason why the Streak should have broke in the half-assed way it did aside from because it was "shocking". Well you know what, it was shocking in the same way the Fingerpoke of Doom was shocking and that too was absolute bullshit booking. Actually think this is worse.

You have something built up for years that most fans are very invested in, something bigger than the title, and you throw it away halfway through the card without any real buildup. Nevermind Lesnar being a part-timer who never really needed this win. This should've been a HUGE moment, with much, much better build up and focus, and something that main evented. And not to mention it completely overshadowed Bryans' win.
This.
 
#2,202 ·
Re: The biggest problem I have with Brock beating Taker

Man...fuck John Cena. Good grief. Last night summed up what he's all about...going over. Same shit all the time. Boring. One dimensional.
 
#2,206 ·
Re: The biggest problem I have with Brock beating Taker

Man...fuck John Cena. Good grief. Last night summed up what he's all about...going over. Same shit all the time. Boring. One dimensional.
The only good thing about Lesner ending the streak, is that Cena didn't. That's it.

Cena is a plague.
 
#9 ·
Brock Vs. Undertaker: Ugh ....

Two part-timers return for a month until Wrestelmania only to have them leave once again. There is a 0.1% chance of Brock Lesnar ending the Undertakers streak, and there is no story behind this match what-so-ever.


How can you possibly be excited for a match you already know the victor of, and where it leads (no where)? I'd love too, but it's not coming together for me.
 
#14 ·
Re: Brock Vs. Undertaker: Ugh ....

Two part-timers return for a month until Wrestelmania only to have them leave once again. There is a 0.1% chance of Brock Lesnar ending the Undertakers streak, and there is no story behind this match what-so-ever.


How can you possibly be excited for a match you already know the victor of, and where it leads (no where)? I'd love too, but it's not coming together for me.
:ti


but I agree. I said it before, Reigns should have been the opponent.

Not only does it push Reigns, but it sets up nicely for Ambrose/Reigns feud as Ambrose should cost Reigns the match.
 
#1,208 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

When SEAN FUCKING WALTMAN is the voice of reason, It's time for someone to pay attention.
Taker coulden't wait for Reigns to get credible enough to challenge the Streak. Did you see how shitty Taker was in the ring?
 
#2,673 · (Edited)
Re: The biggest problem I have with Brock beating Taker

The Biggest Problem *I* have with Brock beating Taker are Cena-fanboys creating threads about how Cena was the one who should've beaten the Streak. :rolleyes:


Brock Lesnar is the ONLY BEING on this entire planet(Part-Time or not) that should've(and did) ended the streak.

If anything, it restored most(if not all) of the aura he had lost due to the Fk'ery of his Booking upon his WWE Return(and I'm talking especially about his ridiculous loss to John Cena).

Now his aura is back and I couldn't be happier. :)
 
#2,722 ·
Re: The biggest problem I have with Brock beating Taker

The Biggest Problem *I* have with Brock beating Taker are Cena-fanboys creating threads about how Cena was the one who should've beaten the Streak. :rolleyes:


Brock Lesnar is the ONLY BEING on this entire planet(Part-Time or not) that should've(and did) ended the streak.

If anything, it restored most(if not all) of the aura he had lost due to the Fk'ery of his Booking upon his WWE Return(and I'm talking especially about his ridiculous loss to John Cena).

Now his aura is back and I couldn't be happier. :)
Thank you, Captain Hindsight.
 
#2,913 ·
Re: WWE dropped the ball big time...

:allen1

GTFOH with that STING bullshit...

Brock is one of the best in the ring PERIOD, and couldn't get good match out of Taker.TBF Taker was injured,but what makes you thing a PAST THE HILL STING would've gotten a good match out of Undertaker?

These guys have no history,no one wanted this but STING marks. WWE didn't drop the ball, just look at the history between Brock/Undertaker with Brock leaving after getting his big ass push in 2003. The buildup to the match was weak,and the match sucked but make no mistake.

No one wanted to see some bullshit STING vs Taker match besides the delusional marks. Sting hasn't been relevant since 1998 btw.
 
#166 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar - THE BEAST CHALLENGES THE STREAK

Brock in 2014 is BIGGER STAR than anybody Undertaker has faced during his entire streak, period.

This is going to be the match that Wrestlemania XXX is sold on, and probably one of the biggest matches of this decade. Can't wait for Brock to retaliate and royally fuck Taker up heading into Mania.

EPIC.
 
#304 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar - THE BEAST CHALLENGES THE STREAK

Brock will be fine against The Undertaker. why didn't anyone worry about Triple H's condition when he faced Lesnar? It was like 1 year before that he fought Undertaker himself.

Deadman is old, we know. Lesnar is also not goldberg - he's pretty safe, and sells very well. He's not going to go in and attempt to injure the legendary Undertaker
 
#422 ·
Re: Do you think WWE will try to protect Brock?

Just have Undertaker win cleanly. No need for any bullcrap.
 
#689 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar - THERE'S A WAR COMING THIS WAY

I thought this company was stupid, but HOLY FUCK did I underestimate just how dumb they really are. Why would Taker lose the steak in a match with little to no build or storyline of any kind against Brock Lesnar of all people? This is a fucking travesty, I DARE anyone to defend WWE's abysmal garbage after this. Your delusional if you think this is OK.
 
#1,411 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

Definitely the right call. It was Taker's call and that made it right.
He wanted it to end and end it did. Can anyone here honestly say that anyone else deserved to beat one of the most traditional wrestlers left?
If I'm Undertaker, then I take one good look in that locker room and immediately say "No one here has paid the dues that I have."

You can make a case for Triple H or Shawn Michaels. They would've been better candidates. But that was up to 5 years ago. Taker felt he still had it to keep going. A lot happens in the 365 days between these matches. Taker is human just like all of us and he probably finally felt it was time to start wrapping up loose ends.

I've read that Taker didn't want to retire with the Streak. I've read the WWE wanted to keep it going as it was the only selling point for Taker at this point. I believe both.
Lesnar may not have been the perfect guy, but he was a better choice than leaving Cena or HHH with the burden. Cena is cementing his legacy as the ultimate tweener. Triple H has enough baggage to go with his shovel.

Lesnar really was a good choice and he had paid his dues. Maybe not recently. But if we're counting 21 years of a career, why does Lesnar's full career get discounted?

ALL that being said, the Streak won't overshadow a potential Sting/Taker matchup that will most likely send both of them into retirement. And that is fitting. They should have their full careers on display and not just one aspect of one guy's career on the line.
 
#1,412 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I think it's great just how built up "The Streak" had become.
Ever since it became a thing, they've tried to give Taker the most credible or popular opponents at that given time. Each time you thought maybe this guy will beat it, probably not, but maaayybe..

By now, everyone had pretty much had it in their head that "The Streak" was untouchable and a foregone conclusion that Taker would win. That is what makes Brock winning tonight at Mania so great. NO ONE saw it coming and again the right man went over.

Logic: Taker is an MMA type of guy. Brock was huge in UFC. Taker respects Brock enough to do the job. Some of you would rather see someone like Bray Wyatt, for example, end the streak but look at it from Taker's POV.

Bray is most likely nothing more than a hot up and coming "rookie" in his eyes right now. No, the guy to end Taker's streak had to be 100% credible and NO ONE is more 100% credible in WWE right now than Brock Lesnar. He's a cross over athlete this likes of which WWE has never seen outside of maybe Kurt Angle, except that he's bigger and badder and probably more well known.

I'm looking forward to Brock, Heyman, and a tombstone prop in the ring tomorrow with THE STREAK etched on it. :D
 
#1,445 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I think it's great just how built up "The Streak" had become.
Ever since it became a thing, they've tried to give Taker the most credible or popular opponents at that given time. Each time you thought maybe this guy will beat it, probably not, but maaayybe..

By now, everyone had pretty much had it in their head that "The Streak" was untouchable and a foregone conclusion that Taker would win. That is what makes Brock winning tonight at Mania so great. NO ONE saw it coming and again the right man went over.

Logic: Taker is an MMA type of guy. Brock was huge in UFC. Taker respects Brock enough to do the job. Some of you would rather see someone like Bray Wyatt, for example, end the streak but look at it from Taker's POV.

Bray is most likely nothing more than a hot up and coming "rookie" in his eyes right now. No, the guy to end Taker's streak had to be 100% credible and NO ONE is more 100% credible in WWE right now than Brock Lesnar. He's a cross over athlete this likes of which WWE has never seen outside of maybe Kurt Angle, except that he's bigger and badder and probably more well known.

I'm looking forward to Brock, Heyman, and a tombstone prop in the ring tomorrow with THE STREAK etched on it. :D
I like this post a lot, actually made me reevaluate my initial reaction. Good job
 
#1,420 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

This is actually the best thing they could've done.

A win over the streak would just kill someone's career. Think about it. Think about how legendary Taker is...if an up and comer beat him at Mania, he'd get hated his whole career. I don't mean heat if he was a heel (one that, by the way, would never be able to turn face), I mean legit hate. And then we have the fact that the streak would be used as a stepping plate for someone, and that that someone probably wouldn't live up to the expectations...it would flop. We don't have that with Lesnar, Heyman will probably give the perfect follow up and he'll face Bryan for the title.

Fact is Taker had to go out on a loss. He's old school, old guys leave looking at the lights. Hogan, Austin, Foley, Flair, Michaels, Rock (if 29 was his last match). Heck even JBL. Someone had to break the streak. And face it, we were getting tired of the same old ass promo and the same old ass match every year, it's been going on since WM 25! The build ups are always the same. So he ended it, to the only guy that could and would.

The streak matches have always been about Taker and not about whoever's facing him. A full-time wrestler would get hated for breaking the streak. Punk wouldn't get another pop for the rest of his life. A up and comer wouldn't live up to it. A legend or someone like HHH would be the worst. Fuck, Cena winning it would be even worse than what happened with Bray, and everybody raged over that. It had to be a legitimate monster heel part-timer. Who else do we have?

This is also a perfect start for the Reality Era. You'll never forget WM XXX the same way you'll always remember WM X-Seven, it's the end of an era, and simultaneously the start of a new one. It could've been a better match and definitely a better feud, but damn it if it wasn't smart that Brock won tonight. This gets Red Wedding level of heartache from every wrestling fan in the world.
 
#1,426 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

This is actually the best thing they could've done.

A win over the streak would just kill someone's career. Think about it. Think about how legendary Taker is...if an up and comer beat him at Mania, he'd get hated his whole career. I don't mean heat if he was a heel (one that, by the way, would never be able to turn face), I mean legit hate. And then we have the fact that the streak would be used as a stepping plate for someone, and that that someone probably wouldn't live up to the expectations...it would flop. We don't have that with Lesnar, Heyman will probably give the perfect follow up and he'll face Bryan for the title.

Fact is Taker had to go out on a loss. He's old school, old guys leave looking at the lights. Hogan, Austin, Foley, Flair, Michaels, Rock (if 29 was his last match). Heck even JBL. Someone had to break the streak. And face it, we were getting tired of the same old ass promo and the same old ass match every year, it's been going on since WM 25! The build ups are always the same. So he ended it, to the only guy that could and would.

The streak matches have always been about Taker and not about whoever's facing him. A full-time wrestler would get hated for breaking the streak. Punk wouldn't get another pop for the rest of his life. A up and comer wouldn't live up to it. A legend or someone like HHH would be the worst. Fuck, Cena winning it would be even worse than what happened with Bray, and everybody raged over that. It had to be a legitimate monster heel part-timer. Who else do we have?

This is also a perfect start for the Reality Era. You'll never forget WM XXX the same way you'll always remember WM X-Seven, it's the end of an era, and simultaneously the start of a new one. It could've been a better match and definitely a better feud, but damn it if it wasn't smart that Brock won tonight. This gets Red Wedding level of heartache from every wrestling fan in the world.
Anyone who beats the streak would have to be top heel with momentum, it doesn't have to be a face. They could've easily built someone up for that purpose. Punk wouldn't get a pop again? I think you're overrating the streak way too much, it wasn't all that only 5 years ago.
 
#1,436 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I'm actually glad it happened.

It makes a lot of sense, Kaybfabe wise too. Remember how Hogan said that after Warrior won, no one cared and everyone watched Hulk Hogan leave the building?

This felt like the same. The second Lesnar won, it was barely about him. All eyes were on taker, it was HIS moment.

Taker being the fan of boxing/MMA that he is.. I think he modeled it after what happens to pretty much every dominant fighter. No one randomly retires on tops. Everyone keeps going if they are winning, because they think they can still go... it takes a loss to realize "hey, maybe my time is up"

Happens to all the greatest fights and it's always a little heartbreaking. It makes no sense for Taker to just randomly bow out on top. His character would want to keep taking on all challenges as long as he still felt he could compete.

Kayfabe wise, Brock was a great choice. Maybe he doesn't respect the business or whatever but his character is a legit threat. Others have made the point that he's a guy who can take the heat rather than put that on some poor up and comer.

Plus it's nice being surprised once in a while, and I was blown away.
 
#1,465 · (Edited)
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I'm actually glad it happened.

It makes a lot of sense, Kaybfabe wise too. Remember how Hogan said that after Warrior won, no one cared and everyone watched Hulk Hogan leave the building?

This felt like the same. The second Lesnar won, it was barely about him. All eyes were on taker, it was HIS moment.
Eh, not really. WM 6 is always remember for Warrior's victory, not Hogan's loss. WM 30 is the same, it will forever be remembered for Brock's victory, not Taker's loss. It's Brock's moment not Taker's. Saying otherwise is weird, IMO.

The closest thing to a Taker moment at WM 30 was when a guy in sports entertainment T-shirt called Taker sucks on his way out.

Taker being the fan of boxing/MMA that he is.. I think he modeled it after what happens to pretty much every dominant fighter. No one randomly retires on tops. Everyone keeps going if they are winning, because they think they can still go... it takes a loss to realize "hey, maybe my time is up"

Happens to all the greatest fights and it's always a little heartbreaking. It makes no sense for Taker to just randomly bow out on top. His character would want to keep taking on all challenges as long as he still felt he could compete.

Kayfabe wise, Brock was a great choice. Maybe he doesn't respect the business or whatever but his character is a legit threat. Others have made the point that he's a guy who can take the heat rather than put that on some poor up and comer.

Plus it's nice being surprised once in a while, and I was blown away.
This one I can agree with.

I understands people are sad and shocked over this, hell I am too. But, Brock winning made sense in a few ways.

One, it's continuality. The Undertaker has never beaten Brock Lesnar. Not in 2002, when he was a hotheaded rookie. And not now, at WM 30. Brock has and will always have The Undertaker number.

Two, Taker wanted "an end." Remember when Taker faced HHH, when HHH was "you want an end, well I'm not going to give it to you." That's what is was, Taker wanted someone to put him down, someone who he thought was the rightful man to end his Streak and give him his time. That's why Taker challenged Brock, not vice versa. Taker knew that Brock didn't have the whole "aw shucks, but I respect you Taker," attitude. He doesn't give a damn about anyone but Brock Lesnar. So, what better person to face at WrestleMania than a man who has nothing to lose? Than a man who doesn't have a ounce of respect for anyone but himself? Lesnar was going to be like "I'm sorry, I love you," he just F5'd him into the mat for the 1, 2, 3. No bullshit, no heart-felt moment. Just a man doing what he was wanted. And that's beat the streak.

Three is The Undertaker himself. They had a video package playing for the match, and one of the lines were: "but death itself is slowly dying." The also talked about how Brock "decimated the same men who took Undertaker too the limit." It was all there, we all just missed it all. The streak has become so predictable, that we missed out of what they were telling us. The Undertaker was having a battle with Father Time, and he wanted Brock to end his battle because he knew he couldn't fight anymore.

And I read someone's post earlier about how, if this was Taker's last match it should have been in the main event. Yes, I understand that, but it's entirely possible that this was made a few days ago.
Very well put.

And now, whoever beats Brock is bigger than anybody bar the Holy Trinity (Hogan, Austin, and Rock).

I just hope it's Bryan.
 
#1,464 ·
Re: The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar: THE STREAK IS DEAD (21-1)

I understands people are sad and shocked over this, hell I am too. But, Brock winning made sense in a few ways.

One, it's continuality. The Undertaker has never beaten Brock Lesnar. Not in 2002, when he was a hotheaded rookie. And not now, at WM 30. Brock has and will always have The Undertaker number.

Two, Taker wanted "an end." Remember when Taker faced HHH, when HHH was "you want an end, well I'm not going to give it to you." That's what is was, Taker wanted someone to put him down, someone who he thought was the rightful man to end his Streak and give him his time. That's why Taker challenged Brock, not vice versa. Taker knew that Brock didn't have the whole "aw shucks, but I respect you Taker," attitude. He doesn't give a damn about anyone but Brock Lesnar. So, what better person to face at WrestleMania than a man who has nothing to lose? Than a man who doesn't have a ounce of respect for anyone but himself? Lesnar was going to be like "I'm sorry, I love you," he just F5'd him into the mat for the 1, 2, 3. No bullshit, no heart-felt moment. Just a man doing what he was wanted. And that's beat the streak.

Three is The Undertaker himself. They had a video package playing for the match, and one of the lines were: "but death itself is slowly dying." The also talked about how Brock "decimated the same men who took Undertaker too the limit." It was all there, we all just missed it all. The streak has become so predictable, that we missed out of what they were telling us. The Undertaker was having a battle with Father Time, and he wanted Brock to end his battle because he knew he couldn't fight anymore.

And I read someone's post earlier about how, if this was Taker's last match it should have been in the main event. Yes, I understand that, but it's entirely possible that this was made a few days ago.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top