 |
|
01-06-2013, 10:48 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Working on my abs
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,562
|
Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Simple question. Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Did he really deserve the two reigns 63-71 and 73-77?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-06-2013, 11:14 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Humbled
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 503
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Umm... Yeah!
He was popular in the Tri State like Lou Thesz was popular at Mid Atlantic or Flair at the Carolinas.
|
|
|
01-06-2013, 12:41 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Convinced Vince to make me a Main-Eventer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WHERE THE BUFFALO ROAM
Posts: 11,928
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
He made Vince Sr. a shitload of money. I guess you meant the business standpoint, right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanbrian
TV shows are the best entertainment programmes like wrestling. My favourite TV show is RAW and SMACK DOWN. I specially like fight of Rey mysterio and Randy Ortan. It was very amazing fight with lots of stunt.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2013, 12:50 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Celebrating my first World title
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bolton, England
Posts: 13,158
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Bruno sold out MSG countless times, in an era when it was the champion who drew the crowd and not the organisation he was working for. The fact that WWWF were running a show meant very little in comparison to the fat that Bruno Sammartino was headlining a show.
|
|
|
01-06-2013, 12:55 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,898
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Personally I don't think so. Can't argue he was really over, but I personally never understood why. There was no connection there for me and I wasn't wowed by his ability. He is just one of those pre 80s era wrestlers that I can't see anything in. And that pitifully long reign... I wouldn't want HBK to have the belt for that long. No one should drain the life out of the title scene like that. It's too stagnant.
__________________
Wrestling fan first... company fan last. Nothing worst than the fan that is loyal to the brand first and the wrestling second.
Ahhhh... late night strolls through the forum with my booze. Here's to finding out what the hell I did the next day!
|
|
|
01-06-2013, 06:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The school of hard knocks.
Posts: 1,962
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
In the ring, a definite NO. Bruno sucked as a wrestler with nothing more than punch, kick, stomp, and bear hug. Far more limited than even Hogan, but that doesn't matter at all when you are super over with the paying customer.
__________________
"If anyone asks you if you've paid your dues, you tell 'em the check is in the mail."
Not removing until:
[ ] Hulk Hogan vs Hawk Hogan
|
|
|
01-07-2013, 12:33 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 556
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Bruno sold out the garden more than any other wrestler, that includes Hogan. So he was the Hogan/StoneCold/Rock of his era. Heck Vinnie Mac even managed to lure him back to WWF in 1985-1986 in order to help boost the ticket sales. Considering Hogan was in his prime almost, that is quite a saying.
As for in ring skill. Back in the day, a promotor would never allow a guy who could not take care of himself to be presented as champion.
Bruno may not have been the technical marvel of Dynamite Kid, or Kurt Angle. But he still surpassed them with lightyears. He was over as crazy, was way above avarage in the ring, had that IT factor, and the most important factor he put shit loads of asses to the arena seats, which is what this business is all about. So Back in the day, Bruno was the total package.
__________________
What a horrible night to have a curse
|
|
|
01-07-2013, 01:05 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,867
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Bruno had the look, but he was a piss poor worker who held the title for WAY too long. Christ, you have no idea how happy I was seeing Billy Graham end his second reign!
- Vic
__________________

Here comes The Ax and here comes The Smasher...
|
|
|
01-07-2013, 01:53 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 223
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berkajr
Bruno sold out the garden more than any other wrestler, that includes Hogan. So he was the Hogan/StoneCold/Rock of his era. Heck Vinnie Mac even managed to lure him back to WWF in 1985-1986 in order to help boost the ticket sales. Considering Hogan was in his prime almost, that is quite a saying.
As for in ring skill. Back in the day, a promotor would never allow a guy who could not take care of himself to be presented as champion.
Bruno may not have been the technical marvel of Dynamite Kid, or Kurt Angle. But he still surpassed them with lightyears. He was over as crazy, was way above avarage in the ring, had that IT factor, and the most important factor he put shit loads of asses to the arena seats, which is what this business is all about. So Back in the day, Bruno was the total package.
|
The truth.Bruno was so popular that Vince Jr. signed David in mid 80's so that Bruno could make few appearances.
|
|
|
01-07-2013, 03:31 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,273
|
Re: Was Bruno Sammartino that good?
If he wasn't good,he wouldn't have held the title for so many years and be the biggest draw in history(Dave Meltzer's list)
__________________
Stone Cold on CM Punk's epic promo-CMPunk just melted my 52 inch TV with a scorching hot
promo...delivery, content, and attitude...one of
the best promos I've ever seen.
Hulk Hogan on CM Punk-I think CM PUNK has stepped up and proved he can hold his own with anybody in the ring and anybody on the mic,he's on a roll. HH
My favourite wrestlers:
1.Stone Cold Steve Austin
2.HHH
3.CM Punk
4.Brock Lesnar
5.The Rock
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|