Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble? - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 10:59 AM Thread Starter
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
Vic Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,015
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
                     
Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

Did they actually have plans for him to headline Wrestlemania 13 and if not, why bother wasting a Royal Rumble win on a guy that wasn't going to be wrestling for the WWF Championship at the company's biggest show?

- Vic



August 17, 2014
The Greatest Night In The History Of Our Sport!
Vic Capri is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 11:07 AM
Humbled
 
Yosihait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 503
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

Because they wanted to surprise people.

Bret Hart was supposed to win the Rumble, but they realized it sucked.
Yosihait is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 11:38 AM
Bringing you the truth...no matter how bad it hurts..
 
Three Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: My Fortified bunker in the middle of the DC Hellhole.
Posts: 1,333
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
               
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

1 Because Stone Cold won like everything in 97 he was over on like that other level shit
2. yeah they wanted a mass suprise because who would have thought steve austin on one of the greatest pushes ever would lose? super pop super push to the guy who beat him then Stone Cold goes out that monday cracks open a beer and everyone forgets and is ready for his next run at it! wrestling used to be SO SIMPLE back then!

“Look, let’s start with some tough love. You two suck at peddling meth. Period. Did you not plan for this contingency? I mean even the Starship Enterprise had a self-destruct button.... I'm just saying.” –


[] Adrian Neville/PAC wins a Title In WWE
Three Dog is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 12:06 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Jose, CA (formerly Cardiff, UK)
Posts: 697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
     
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

I don't know, but it's always awkard having a February PPV when the Rumble winner is known and there are major hints about who the champion will be going into Wrestlemania. Prior to that they had the Rumble winner voluntarily put their shot on the line but they couldn't do that every year.
sarnobat is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 01:47 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

1. To further the "Everybody screws me" gimmick of Bret which would lead to his heel turn at Mania 13.

2. To build the February PPV with the Final Four of the Rumble competing again for the title shot.

Last edited by murder; 01-06-2013 at 01:49 PM.
murder is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 01:52 PM
Winning World titles, Custom Made Clothes
 
just1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bolton, England
Posts: 15,946
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

Good thread, I'd never given this any thought but everything posted is very interesting and seems legit


COME ON IN, ADD, FOLLOW AND SUBSCRIBE


Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/anwar.thinks
Twitter: http://twitter.com/anwar_thinks
just1988 is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 01:58 PM
✯✯✯ Kissing Under the Mistletoe ✯✯✯
 
Clique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Irving, TX by way of Chicago, IL
Posts: 18,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
2. To build the February PPV with the Final Four of the Rumble competing again for the title shot.
Question - was the plan always to have a four way for the title at that show? Shawn won the WWF Championship in the main event of Royal Rumble 1997 and you would have to think WWE would have wanted him going into WrestleMania 13 as champion, so maybe Final Four would have unquestionably determined who would have faced him at Mania. And from what I have read over the years the original main event planned for Mania that year was a rematch between Shawn & Bret.


THIS CHRISTMAS
ALL I'M REALLY ASKING FOR IS YOU

Clique is online now  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 02:12 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clique View Post
Question - was the plan always to have a four way for the title at that show? Shawn won the WWF Championship in the main event of Royal Rumble 1997 and you would have to think WWE would have wanted him going into WrestleMania 13 as champion, so maybe Final Four would have unquestionably determined who would have faced him at Mania. And from what I have read over the years the original main event planned for Mania that year was a rematch between Shawn & Bret.
The Final Four match was originally supposed to be for the number one contender spot. Since the Rumble had no clear winner that spot was basically vacant. Bret was supposed to win that match to set-up Bret-HBK for the title at mania like you said.

After the decision was made that Bret-HBK would be non-title but with the hair stipulation and Sid-Taker would be for the title, Sid was supposed to win the title on raw before the PPV where Taker would win the Final Four.

After Shawn lost his smile the title was vacant and the Final Four became a title match with Sid challenging the champion on Raw the next night.
murder is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 02:27 PM
✯✯✯ Kissing Under the Mistletoe ✯✯✯
 
Clique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Irving, TX by way of Chicago, IL
Posts: 18,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

Thanks. I figured that was the case. Just wondering if there were "official" insider reports/stories on it. I've heard the hair stipulation for Shawn/Bret rematch. I think there was also a rumor about having a ladder match too for the title. Even though WrestleMania 13 didn't turn out to be the best show match quality wise on the overall card, at least we got that legendary Hart-Austin Submission Match that just put the rocket on Austin's momentum. Stone Cold became white hot through that program with the Hitman.


THIS CHRISTMAS
ALL I'M REALLY ASKING FOR IS YOU

Clique is online now  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 01-06-2013, 07:48 PM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
jonoaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 555 Centaur Dr.
Posts: 4,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why did Stone Cold win the 1997 Royal Rumble?

It furthered the Bret-Austin story-line for bret to be "screwed" yet again. As far as I know there were no plans for Austin to ever challenge for the title at Wrestlemania 13. I'm sure the Hart-Michaels controversy changed the outcome of the rumble match.
Austin was the beneficiary of HBK being a dick. Seems Austin benefitted from the Clique fucking up a lot huh?
jonoaries is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome