Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999) - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 12-04-2012, 03:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
JigsawKrueger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Woodsboro High
Posts: 2,380
JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000JigsawKrueger 501 - 1000
Default Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

I seem to have read this before; even McMahon mentioned his name in the promo at the time, so presumably dirtsheets were suggesting.

At the time Jake was a drunk and probably high on crack, but he didn't look too bad at ECW November to Remember 1998. Plus, there were probably many other WWF wrestlers on drugs at the time - Vince didn't seem to give a shit when controversy was good and the money was rolling in.

Has Russo ever mentioned it?
__________________
JigsawKrueger is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 12-04-2012, 03:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
6 ▪ 0 ▪ 4
 
A$AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,958
A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500A$AP 5001 - 5500
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Even if he was it's understandable why that idea didn't go through. There was shit hitting the fan all over the place at the time and Roberts would have been one more liability.

I've never seen it mentioned personally though.
__________________


A$AP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 03:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Crusade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,718
Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000Crusade 1501 - 2000
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

I've never heard of this rumour before. Interesting. Would have been a cool twist.
__________________


Laura Stevenson



Quote:
Originally Posted by Asenath View Post
At this rate "bury" is never going to start sounding like a real word again.
Crusade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 03:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Gaz.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Bonny Bonny Banks
Posts: 520
Gaz. 501 - 1000Gaz. 501 - 1000Gaz. 501 - 1000Gaz. 501 - 1000Gaz. 501 - 1000Gaz. 501 - 1000
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

I've actually read this before as well, on here infact. Highly doubt it though, all booking sense did point towards McMahon. Would of liked to have seen where they'd of taken the angle with Roberts though.
__________________


"There's no shame, in going out fighting, and getting your ass kicked...
But there's no honor... in not fighting at all."


July 16th, 2001.

Gaz. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 04:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
dave 1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,382
dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500dave 1981 6001 - 6500
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

No not at any point was Jake Roberts meant to be The Higher Power that The Undertaker was always talking about in his Ministry Of Darkness run from late 1998 to latter 1999 and it was simply something that was spoken about as a "what if" thing on a message board or forum. In all honesty though i think Jake Roberts in that role and in that era would have been fucking epic as he really could have cut loose in an evil manner on the mic and literally tore shit up.
__________________
dave 1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 04:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Mr.Socko2101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 560
Mr.Socko2101 251 - 500Mr.Socko2101 251 - 500Mr.Socko2101 251 - 500Mr.Socko2101 251 - 500
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Wrestlecrap did a pretty good "Rewriting The Book" booking scenario on it. Since I was pretty young at the time I thought the McMahon reveal was amazing until I realised how stupid it was a few weeks later. The start of my first slowburn heel turn in to smarkdom if I remember correctly.
__________________
Marking out like a B!tch for:
WWE: Y2J, Ziggler, Orton, Christian, The Shield, Punk, Heyman, Brock and (God help my soul) Faaaaaan.....Daaaaaaaan....Gooooo

TNA: Roode, Magnus, AJ, Daniels & Kazarian

Others: John Morrison, Alex Shelley, Kenny Omega, Kota Ibushi

Would Mark out like a B!tch for:
-John Morrison return with "Hi I'm John Morrison" persona
-Batista Return
-One last solid title run for Jericho
-Otunga advertising Coffee
-MCMG theme song
-Zack Ryder Heel Turn
-Curt Hawkins Push/Rekking Crew Return
...I can but dream....
Mr.Socko2101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 08:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
Hey, Leroy.......YOU WARMED UP YET???
 
Sho'nuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,765
Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000Sho'nuff 2501 - 3000
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Actually, I heard back during Raven's feud with DDP IIRC, Jake was suppose to be involved, with the storyline being that he trained both men.
__________________
Sho'nuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 08:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Old School, cause I'm an old fool....
 
Greenlawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The South
Posts: 779
Greenlawler 501 - 1000Greenlawler 501 - 1000Greenlawler 501 - 1000Greenlawler 501 - 1000Greenlawler 501 - 1000Greenlawler 501 - 1000
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

I have never heard this...but it would have been fabulous.

I would have personally marked out if it had been Kevin Sullivan.
Greenlawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Takertheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,462
Takertheman 501 - 1000Takertheman 501 - 1000Takertheman 501 - 1000Takertheman 501 - 1000Takertheman 501 - 1000Takertheman 501 - 1000Takertheman 501 - 1000
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

No, but it would've been interesting to see it happen given the fact that Jake worked with Undertaker in 1991/1992 and was the final man that Stone Cold defeated in the 1996 King of the Ring tournament. It would've made sense for Jake to be the Higher Power because Stone Cold basically turned him into a catchphrase.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catalanotto View Post
Say what you gotta say while awake, don't let people on the internet rob you of sleep for work or school or just in general because of what they have to say. That's retarded.
Boots To Barbies
I'm An Asshole. Deal with it fucker!
Kelly Kelly and her moronic fans
R.I.P. Father of Destruction 1954-2013
Takertheman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
ninealevyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 1,237
ninealevyn 501 - 1000ninealevyn 501 - 1000ninealevyn 501 - 1000ninealevyn 501 - 1000ninealevyn 501 - 1000ninealevyn 501 - 1000ninealevyn 501 - 1000
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

I heard this rumor before, and I think it hold's some weight. During the Attitude Era while they were about pushing the new stars of the generation it's not rare too have a former super star be brought back with a revised gimmick. They brought back Bossman and remodeled him for the generation, so, it's likely they had a deal that didn't go through, but was in talks.

Overall, I think the whole storyline was botched, and I don't remember it clearly because I was a child at the time, but looking back at it was stupid. What I find stupid about it is it's the damn Undertaker. Why would Undertaker need to work for a higher power? He's the most intimidating wrestler in WWE history. At the time he was already a former champion. Personally, I liked the touch of Vince calling him Mark and saying he was taking the Undertaker gimmick to far.

It also didn't fit McMahon's character. He was already hell bent on making sure Austin wasn't champion and he wanted the top guy in his company to be who he thought it should be, I understand wanting to strike fear in his employees so he aligns himself with Taker, but most CEO's don't show who's boss by torturing their daughters. I also don't see how Robert's would've fit, he's always been sadistic, and the religious elements to his character had been added, and they could've been used for bad or good, but how in the hell is Jake Robert's a higher power than Undertaker?
__________________
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic162601_1.gif
ninealevyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios