Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999) - Page 2 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply

Old 12-05-2012, 02:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,843
Geeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more seriousGeeee needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

This storyline was kinda lame apart from the epic "it's me Austin!" line and I didn't really feel the Corporate Ministry faction that resulted either.
Geeee is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 12-05-2012, 02:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
theidealstranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,472
theidealstranger needs to take rep more serioustheidealstranger needs to take rep more serioustheidealstranger needs to take rep more serioustheidealstranger needs to take rep more serioustheidealstranger needs to take rep more serioustheidealstranger needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Yeah. It was rumored around that time and I even recollect hearing about The Snake's history with Rattlesnake (I just whooped your ass) and his relationship with Taker (Warrior angle) which was played out by J.R at that time. I came to know about The Snake, in fact, from that angle as I started with AE/MNW. Would have been wonderful if it was Jake, revealing it was Vince practically blew it for me for that was what he was doing for such a long time and he did not need the Ministry Angle.
__________________
Spoiler for Muggers, Proud Creators of Batman:
theidealstranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 05:55 AM   #13 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Lesnar Turtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 854
Lesnar Turtle needs to take rep more seriousLesnar Turtle needs to take rep more seriousLesnar Turtle needs to take rep more seriousLesnar Turtle needs to take rep more seriousLesnar Turtle needs to take rep more seriousLesnar Turtle needs to take rep more serious
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Never heard that one before. I heard it was initially supposed to be The Jackyl.
Lesnar Turtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 07:00 AM   #14 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
JLawls91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: England
Posts: 896
JLawls91 JLawls91 JLawls91 JLawls91 JLawls91 JLawls91 JLawls91
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Hi all, just joined the forum and this is my post.

I've recently watched the whole of 1999, I have the recordings burned onto my hard drive. Although I'm not sure how true it was, JR does say 'Is it Jake The Snake Roberts' on his list of people the higher power could've been. I think it was just a rumour because it was an anti-climax being someone internal (Vince).

When I watched it at the time I was shocked it was Vince, although after watching it some 10 years later; it's obvious with the pre-recorded video by Vince.
JLawls91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 08:07 AM   #15 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Yosihait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 503
Yosihait
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takertheman View Post
No, but it would've been interesting to see it happen given the fact that Jake worked with Undertaker in 1991/1992 and was the final man that Stone Cold defeated in the 1996 King of the Ring tournament. It would've made sense for Jake to be the Higher Power because Stone Cold basically turned him into a catchphrase.
This. It will make so much sense.
Yosihait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 08:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
roadkill_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The WWE Universe
Posts: 2,238
roadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new hereroadkill_ better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Does anyone know why The Jackyl (The original choice) was fired?
__________________


www.manlymovie.net
roadkill_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 08:32 AM   #17 (permalink)
Largest arms in the world, BROTHER!
 
TripleG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 32,896
TripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by SeabsTripleG is probably liked by Seabs
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

He was rumored at the time. I do remember reading that back then on the net. DiBiase's name also came up alot lot in discussion.

But the fact that McMahon mentioned Jake on TV as a possible suspect pretty much eliminated him in my eyes.
__________________
WEEKDAY WARRIORS OF WRESTLING: The Podcast I'm On
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=95975&cmd=tc

HELL IN A CELL PPV PREVIEW


TripleG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 10:46 AM   #18 (permalink)
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
 
tducey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a house
Posts: 4,782
tducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friendstducey needs to make some friends
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

I always thought it was going to be Ted Dibiase as well. Anyone made more sense than Mcmahon though.
__________________
This meme courtesy of a WWE meme page on Facebook

What's MC Funk doing in the Impact Zone?

tducey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 10:52 AM   #19 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 475
Roncaglione Roncaglione
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

No one was for the role.

Typcial Russo booking yourself in a corner booking.
Roncaglione is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 11:55 AM   #20 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Yosihait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Israel
Posts: 503
Yosihait
Default Re: Was Jake Roberts meant to be 'Taker's higher power (1999)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roncaglione View Post
No one was for the role.

Typcial Russo booking yourself in a corner booking.
And get the highest rating ever for RAW at the same time.
Yosihait is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios