Originally Posted by tducey
The Undertaker should have King Mabel's push back in the summer of 1995. Why they made Mabel King of The Ring I'll never know.
King Taker carried out on his throne by slaves to wrestle Nash for the title at Summerslam. Right, why didn't they book that instead?!
Good thing you've mentioned 1995 because Bret should have had Nashs spot. McMahon couldn't make up his mind about Bret now could he? First they depush him in favor of Hogan, after Hogan left they tried Luger instead of Bret. Then they went back to Bret and depushed him again in favor of Nash. Same thing happened again in 96 with HBK and again in 97 with Taker.
Now it's not like Bret had flopped at any time as champion, he's been a bigger draw than all of the aforementioned wrestlers except of Hogan. But Vince, the genius that he is obviously thought that Luger, Nash, HBK and Taker would draw better than Bret.