The most complete wrestler ever.. - Page 4 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 03:26 PM
Kick rocks in flip flops, break a toe and skidaddle sweetboy
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 5,406
Points: 298
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Austin, HBK, The Undertaker and Jake Roberts - In that order.

Flux is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #32 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 03:56 PM
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 15,867
Points: 0
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

- Ric Flair
- Ric Flair
- Ric Flair
- Ric Flair
- Mr. Perfect
Chismo is offline  
post #33 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 04:28 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
RDClip's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 267
Points: 0
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Originally Posted by Seth Mustaine View Post
Chris Jericho.
Agreed, if Jericho was born to be 4 inches taller, he would have been the biggest name in pro wrestling history.

RDClip is offline  
post #34 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 04:49 PM
Cutting a shoot promo to get over
dave 1981's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,025
Points: 121
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Shawn Michaels followed by Ric Flair, Kurt Angle, Stone Cold Steve Austin, Tully Blanchard and Jerry Lawler in my opinion.

dave 1981 is offline  
post #35 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 04:51 PM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
PGSucks's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 4,413
Points: 3
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

I'm no historian by ANY means, but I'd put Angle, Austin, Jericho, HBK, Flair, and hell, even Eddie Guerrero on my list. Most of the other guys mentioned in my thread are guys I don't know a ton about because they were either before my time, or wrestling when I didn't watch.

Spoiler for Currently Marking For:

PGSucks is offline  
post #36 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 05:38 PM
If I really don't like someone, I call them a Tony Schiavone.---Ron Funches
Elipses Corter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 11,414
Points: 1,949
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Just to mention somebody that nobody has mentioned, I'm going to say Shane Douglas, especially between '96-'98.

Elipses Corter is offline  
post #37 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 05:58 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
English Dragon's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: England.
Posts: 960
Points: 0
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

The Rock.

Hustle, Loyalty & Respect.


English Dragon is offline  
post #38 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 06:14 PM
Little Poppa Pump
Zankman Jack's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2,158
Points: 0
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Originally Posted by KingCal View Post
Mic Skills
In-ring ability
Ring psychology
Technical skill

Kurt is missing something, but I can't quite place what it is .
Why does he lack Ring psychology?

Originally Posted by Elstro1988 View Post
Really, really enjoyed this week's Superstars. Honestly, the fans who are too snobbish to watch it, dismissing it as 'Jobberstars' really miss out.
Originally Posted by -Extra- View Post
This post really makes you too smart for a '12er, doesn't it? Your new join date is 2008.
Zankman Jack is offline  
post #39 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 06:31 PM
Mercy's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,194
Points: 2,238
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Originally Posted by Zankman Jack View Post
Why does he lack Ring psychology?
It's the mouth piece... Terry Funk didn't wear a fucking mouth piece #DEMBOYS

As for Kurt's ring psychology. It's just very inconsistent in my opinion. Kurt can use ring psychology for 15 minutes of a match and then in the 16th-18th minute totally throw all of that ring psychology out and completely no sell it for the big finish. It can somewhat get annoying to those that are really into ring psychology.

As for me personally, it doesn't bother me in the slightest. But it is there and it's quite obvious at times.

That being said, Kurt Angle is far from the only big time wrestler guilty of this.

Mercy is offline  
post #40 of 76 (permalink) Old 07-12-2012, 06:56 PM
Ben Wyatt's Low Cal Calzone Zone
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Golfing with Stephen Hawking, he lied about his handicap. Didn't need a golf cart though, I just sat in his lap.
Posts: 5,851
Points: 334
Re: The most complete wrestler ever..

Meh, Angle was never a student of the game. He's a tremendous amateur wrestler and one of the most legitimate athletes in the history of the industry, but being a tremendous WRESTLER doesn't make you a tremendous WORKER by default. Its why John Cena is a very good (sometimes excellent) worker despite being sub-par at best in terms of pure wrestling ability.

Angle isn't like a Finlay, a Terry Funk, a William Regal, an Arn Anderson etc. He didn't grow up being told the basics of the business, how to structure a match, how to plan a match to put over a young guy but not at his own expense, how and when to sell, how to convey fear/anger/desperation/pain through his facial expressions, how to time a move to get the best reaction from the fans etc. Guys like Funk etc grew up working crowds up and down the country and internationally, they know how to put over a young guy, how to heel it up and keep a crowd invested and most importantly, they know how to do all of this whilst wrestling a simple and basic style where the emphasis is on the story and substance behind the moves, each move/sequence has meaning behind it and is used to put over the match rather than be there for the sake of an impressive looking spot.

As Angle has slowly become a veteran in the business instead of the promising rookie he was in 2000/2001 his matches over time have slowly worsened, as the rookie he could be led to excellent matches by Austin and Undertaker, guys who knew how to create substance and structure to their matches but crucially knew how to work a match that highlighted all of Angle's strengths whilst hiding his limitations.

Look, Angle is a polarising force, you either love the sprint epics where its more about the counters and the nearfalls than character work, selling, build, structure or you find him largely intolerable but sometimes able to show promise. For example he was incredible against Austin at Summerslam 2001, and his matches v Taker (Smackdown 2003 and NWO 2006) are two of the best matches WWE put on this past decade. The man clearly has talent for the business, he's just never really had that pro wrestling brain where he can work smarter/slower matches and save his body whilst still putting his opponent over and connect with a crowd. Because of this his body has broken down because he really only knows one way to wrestle, and that's the sprint style featuring big transitions, counters, nearfalls and kickouts because ever since The 2003 Royal Rumble opposite Benoit he's become convinced that's the only way to pop a crowd.

There are numerous issues where his lack of psychology is evident, the fact a lot of his matches very rarely have a build/structure to them, there's a lot of moves/transitions but there's no clear build to big spots: e.g in your average Flair title defence, he'd spent the vast majority of the beginning of the match getting outwrestled, losing each lock-up/chain wrestling sequence, would bump big for every bit of his opponent's offence and would visibly sell his frustration at being outwrestled. All this would then lead to him finally gaining control, whether it was by a low blow/rake to the eyes, a big bump by his opponent or simply through Flair brilliance: the point was all the damage he took in the early spell of the match built to that one moment where he would take over and then his opponent would be the one to sell. With Angle you very rarely get that, instead you usually get some default matwork/trading of holds, before they break away into the punches/stomps/suplexes/rest hold portion of the match. With a smarter worker, usually say Regal if he was to do matwork for 3-5 minutes at the start of a match, he'd make it mean something. Usually he'd be outwrestled or constantly be unable to keep control, indeed one of his famous spots at house shows is to run almost comedy esque spots where his opponent will time and time again counter every move Regal tries and dump him on his ass. It gets the crowd involved, but crucially it adds a story to the match and serves as reason for Regal to move away from matwork and try a new method to gain control: ergo the sequences whilst crowd pleasing and visually cool mean something. They don't just suddenly decide "hey, screw the matwork, now we're gonna punch and trade suplex counters" etc.

Now this doesn't mean Angle is a bad worker, it just means me personally I prefer the Flair/Regal example, where the spots mean something in the larger context of the match and aren't just there to start the match. They tie into and develop the characters within the match and serve a larger purpose, and as I've gotten older workers who can do this on a regular basis are the guys I tend to find on the whole better. Again I'm by no means right when I say Finlay >>>>>>>> Angle, because you could easily reply that Finlay's style is slow and plodding, and Angle's is more dynamic and gets a crowd more invested. You'd have a valid argument and a lot of people would be inclined to agree with you.

So aye, a whole lot of rambling there, but essentially the problem a lot of people have with Angle is that he's a guy who can do the epic sprints and fast paced wrestling match, but there exist a lot of fans who prefer a story/character dynamic etc to dominate a wrestling match, and Angle's style whilst retaining its fans will annoy/infuriate those looking for more meaning and depth to the sequences. It doesn't make either party right in their opinion as to whether he's excellent or mediocre, its just evidence that different stylistic preferences will always divide.
WOOLCOCK is offline  

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome