Why Mabel? - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 05:59 AM Thread Starter
GET MY BAGS
 
the modern myth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9,303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Why Mabel?

1995 was a pretty bullshit year for WWF. Despite having legendary performers on the roster (Bret Hart, Undertaker, Shawn Michaels, Razor Ramon, British Bulldog, Lex Luger, Owen Hart) they seemed incapable of producing quality programming. They made a lot of mistakes that year (the 35 minute Royal Rumble match, the entire Wrestlemania 11 card, Diesel's boring championship reign) but - by far - the shittest part of the year was Mabel winning the King Of The Ring tournament.

Does anybody know why Mabel (of all people) won the King of the Ring instead of far better (and more deserving) performers like Shawn Michaels, British Bulldog, Bam Bam Bigelow, Razor Ramon, Undertaker etc. It always seemed like an odd decision. It also made the worst Summerslam main event I've ever seen - Diesel vs Mabel. What did WWF see in Mabel?

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lt9zbhgZAW1qmssh1o1_400.jpg
the modern myth is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 06:03 AM
They taped over your mouth, scribbled out the truth with their lies
 
The Manowarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Where The Lines Overlap
Posts: 9,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why Mabel?

It was a big mistake. Like they wanted to make something, out of nothing.

I accept Hayley Williams rep.

The Manowarrior is offline  
post #3 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 06:07 AM
Disciple of McMahonism
 
sxsonar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: Why Mabel?

Only Vince McMahon could tell you . . . my best guess is that he was pushed solely based on his size.
sxsonar is offline  
post #4 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 06:25 AM
Meltzer said I'm a good worker
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why Mabel?

I guess it was just part of Vince's love for the huge guys back than, it wouldn't be the only time he pushed an undeserving super heavyweight which got him nowhere.

That Guy is offline  
post #5 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 06:25 AM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
I got 2 words 4 ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Eire/Creta
Posts: 1,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
             
Re: Why Mabel?

It's called Tryin too create NEW stars...Something WWE gets lambasted for now a days!

We Want Our Trophy Back!!! Sir Alex = GOAT
"He left cos you're shit, he left cos you're shiit, Robin Van Persie, He left cos your shit."Bradford fan's too Arsenal fan's
RVP Our MVP


Atitude Era Was When I Fell In Love With The WWF

I love Diva's.......Maryse is possibly the sexiest woman alive!!
I got 2 words 4 ya is offline  
post #6 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 06:30 AM Thread Starter
GET MY BAGS
 
the modern myth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9,303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why Mabel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by I got 2 words 4 ya View Post
It's called Tryin too create NEW stars...Something WWE gets lambasted for now a days!
I understand that they wanted to create a 'new star' but, what I'll never understand, is why did they choose Mabel?

On the roster at the time they had some really talented guys who, with just a little push like the KOTR'95, could've been really big: Hakushi was really talented and had a brilliant look; Bam Bam Bigelow was flirting with the main event and a KOTR win could have propelled him into the top tier; Razor Ramon was hugely popular and, with a win like this, could have been a brilliant main event staple. There were countless more talented people than Mabel.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lt9zbhgZAW1qmssh1o1_400.jpg
the modern myth is offline  
post #7 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 06:33 AM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
I got 2 words 4 ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Eire/Creta
Posts: 1,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
             
Re: Why Mabel?

I cant recall ALL they storys from back tho (tho i did watch it live on Sky and i was like 12) but id imagine it was a swerve!Werent Men On a Mission very over prior too this?

We Want Our Trophy Back!!! Sir Alex = GOAT
"He left cos you're shit, he left cos you're shiit, Robin Van Persie, He left cos your shit."Bradford fan's too Arsenal fan's
RVP Our MVP


Atitude Era Was When I Fell In Love With The WWF

I love Diva's.......Maryse is possibly the sexiest woman alive!!
I got 2 words 4 ya is offline  
post #8 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 09:33 AM
Fired by SCOTT STEINER
 
tducey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                   
Re: Why Mabel?

Yeah, Mabel winning the KOTR was a questionable move. I wonder if Mabel was a last minute win as Razor Ramon had a rib injury at the time and could have been a believable King.

This meme courtesy of a WWE meme page on Facebook
tducey is offline  
post #9 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 09:34 AM
Getting over in the mid-card
 
dave 1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,976
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why Mabel?

It was because there wasn't many heels in WWE really in 1995 once Shawn Michaels turned face and WWE wanted to build some new ones although in hindsight King Mabel wasn't and was never going to be the way forward. Look at the roster back then and you can see WWE had Shawn Michaels, Bret Hart, The Undertaker, Diesel and Razor Ramon all as faces whilst the only heels were Sid Vicious whilst he was around, Owen Hart, Yokozuna, Tatanka and IRS.

dave 1981 is offline  
post #10 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2012, 10:19 AM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
jonoaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 555 Centaur Dr.
Posts: 4,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Why Mabel?

95 was a year where all the money that could be made for Vince was in face vs face matches. The Fed had no credible heel characters at all so there's no surprising he scraped the bottom of the barrel for Mabel.

I wouldn't be surprised if Vince was thinking that he needed a large challenger because the champion himself was large besides Diesel had beaten Bulldog, Owen, and Jarrett in matches on Raw so he had limited his pool to work with.

In my mind Mabel never generated enough heat to ever main event anything or even be considered a main event player (and I believe that continues even to him pushing this guy in the 2000s). He must have been just one of Vince's guys.
jonoaries is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome