Originally Posted by just1988
I think having Nash break the streak was a good idea, the problem I had with it was the way that they did it and the aftermath. They could of had Nash beat him dirty but by having him do it was a tazer with the help of Scott Hall was bizarre and then to drop the title straight to Hogan the next night was absolutely ridiculous and pretty much ruined WCW.
I agree, Nash winning was perfectly fine. Hell, he couldve feuded with Hogan after to. They couldve had Hall interfere and Goldberg feuds with him. Hall/Hogan couldve said that Nash planned it and couldve let to Goldberg/Nash vs Hall/Hogan at Souled Out. At superbrawl you get Nash vs Hogan, Hall vs Goldberg. Uncensored you do the rematches with stipulations since that was what the show was about.
Down the line, I still have Hogan win the title from Nash. You then have Goldberg make it his mission to destroy every single of the nwo, then Hogans left. Hogan vs Goldberg II happens, I think it would be a huge gate at Starrcade. Then at Superbrawl 2000 you can do Goldberg vs Nash II, then you slowly build towards Goldberg vs Bret and Bret can beat him, causing Goldbergs second loss.